just cause they claim there is a 12 year study dont mean there was

no proof of the claim then i can dismiss it without proof

even though i got proof

all i can see is something saying they did the study but no link to the actual study

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Drs Klein, Naleway, and Baxter have received research support from Merck and GlaxoSmithKline.

lol receives funding from big pharma/vaccine companies and we are supposed to trust their information and so called research??????

Scientists are human. Scientists have a vested interest in promoting their work, often for status and further research funding, although sometimes for direct financial gain. This can lead to selective reporting of results and occasionally, exaggeration. Peer review is not infallible: journal editors might favour positive findings and newsworthiness. Multiple, independent sources of evidence and replication are much more convincing.

sounds to me like they are getting paid to lie

https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/135/2/e321 this is the vaccine center that supposedly did the study lol

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Drs Klein and Baxter report research support from Merck & Co, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Pasteur, Pfizer, Novartis, MedImmune, and Nuron Biotech; Dr Naleway reports research support from GlaxoSmithKline; and Dr Belongia reports research support from MedImmune. The other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

you need more credible sources for the studies

Getting funding from a source that has a vested interest in vaccinations is a clear and blatant conflict of interest.

So I’m wondering

Would you rather have a child with autism on the low end of the spectrum that lives a normal and long life

Or a non vaccinated child that either dies in infancy or lives to 20 almost max

It’s really a shame that people think it’s better to have the latter

imagine banning people for debating you in a debate server

@Edillon Stop being ignorant and deliberately lying about vaccinations and the realistic risks of not vaccinating. Clearly, you don't understand the realistic risks **of vaccinating** and the harm it could do. Why would you want to risk your children having autism and being completely dependent on you for your entire life? Never being on their own or having children to enjoy. A lot of autistic people do not become independent.

this is similar to the abortion topic

but it kind of contradicts itself

https://www.facebook.com/greenmedinfo/videos/2325821697679985/

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-08-22-bombshell-new-video-exposes-horrifying-crime-of-vaccine-mandates.html

If you’re anti vaxx and pro life, you’re essentially causing your child a lifetime (not that long) of sickness and regular checking into the hospital

@Edillon bullshit it is the other way around

Absolutely not

yea it does can you read

chronic illness is greater in vaccinated

peroid

has it been proven that vaccines are the cause, and the effect is the illness?

https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/1qKev9DqjzwlEXczZR4mjeR-MQunIV6MgQ-S-G_lVZU/https/info.cmsri.org/hubfs/Vaxed%2520Unvaxed%2520Memes/VaxVsUnvaxed%2520Survey%2520Graphic-Updated.png?width=676&height=676

yea it has been proven that ppl who are vaccinated are more likely to have chronic illness

Where

No, you're allowing your child to develop their own immune system with far more advantages than being vaccinated and dependent on pharmaceutical assistance.

are you not reading the graphs the studies have been done

Could you please provide one double-blind, placebo-controlled study that can prove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?

I think they’re bullshit. I see no evidence

No

oh yea you can not

You deny evidence

I haven’t seen evidence