Is that cognitive dissonance or what?

I rest my case, first time I see a globe earth deny gravity for their model lol

Funny how you can't say 3 words without trying to insult me. Is that ad hom or what?

Assuming the eartg is spherical. You need something acting on water to make it stick to the globe. The current theory is gravity, in order to disprove gravity, you need a theory that explains why water sticks to the globe

Press 🇫 for @rivenator12113 logic

You can't even see past your own logical fallacy, >you need a theory that explains why water sticks to the globe
Thank you, you need a theory that can explain why water stick to a sphere or model don't work. You first started with: you don't need gravity in order for globe earth model to work.

hello

Need a theory for why the sun and moon rotate around the earth

Globers say earth and moon rotate around the sun due to the gravitational pull. Atleast they are coming up with a theory

sadly theories dont (cant) come from discord chat rooms

which could be anything else but its highly supported to be gravity

*Blames us for having gravity but doesn't have an explanation on the sun and moon rotating besides the bible*

Which even man wrote god didn't say the earth was stationary

@rivenator12113 you can't even make fallacies since you can't have a logical thought process. You are saying that you assume a globe earth. Therefore the earth is a globe, no matter what you say after that. Now we can also observe water sticking to the globe. Whatever theory you come up with, we can call it gravity or we can call it space glue. Water is stuck to the globe, so wtv theory explains it, whether it's gravity or space glue, it'll not prove the earth is a globe or prove the earth is a disc. It'll explain why there is water on the globe, not why the globe is a globe.

I'm pretty sure he rage quitted

@Akhanyatin I don't think he assumes the earth is a globe he believes it's flat

He believes you think it's a globe since that is the role you applied yourself to

He's making logical fallacies which was the main problem of the debate

Yes he believes it's flat but for the purpose of the discussion he kept saying "we're already assuming that the earth is a globe, stop strawmanning"

earth is round case closed

Yeah pretty much

Anyways gtg, have a good weekend

we didn't even get to that part because someone was getting stuck on one thing rather than saying "prove the earth is globe" instead

bye

Also I'm gonna be gone tomorrow for 6 days starting at 4 am so if I don't respond that's why

Main debate was that @Akhanyatin said that you don't need gavity in or order for globe earther model to work. Keep comforting each other globe earthers 🤣

>no matter what you say after that. Now we can also observe water sticking to the globe. Whatever theory you come up with, we can call it gravity or we can call it space glue
That is gravity, so you need it work. You again disproved yourself lol.

@Abe Lover Straw man, that wasn't what the debate was about.

I think you have a problem with reading. The sentence is longer than that. But as a typical flat earther, you only take the bits and pieces that you like.
We don't ONLY need gravity to prove the earth is a globe. We can prove that the earth is a globe in MANY other ways.
Please don't change my words, when you're too ignorant to understand them.

You literally said: >We don't need gravity in order for globe earth to work. Which I said false then the debate started. Your attention span is something extraordinary

This is the full phrase: 11:51 AM]Akhanyatin:Whether gravity exists or not, is irrelevant wtv replaces it will still assert that the earth is a globe. My whole point is that trying to prove flat earth using advanced notions like gravity won't work since you still can't explain simple notions. Start by explaining simple notions, then try to escalate to gravity. If your model of flat earth only addresses gravity, it's still going to be an inaccurate model since it explains nothing else.
Which I said false to

well we don't need gravity, we need something to keep matter sticking together. whether it's gravity or space glue is irrelevant. if you look for "we don't need gravity" you'll see that it's what i've been saying from the beginning but you've been cherry picking what ever suits your flawed theory.

I can't believe your still saying that

Can you not read?
"Whether gravity exists or not, is irrelevant wtv replaces it will still assert that the earth is a globe."

It's funny because you said the same thing to another guy: cherry picking what ever suits your flawed theory.

read the whole sentence instead of stopping after 6 words

Which I said false, it needs to exists in order for a globe earth model to work.

well no, what needs to exist is a reason why matter sticks together.

Again, you're assuming it already exists.

Do all globe earthers know is to go in circles?

Waste of time to debate

DOES WATER FLY INTO SPACE?

You're litteraly repeating the same thing when you have nothing to come up.