Which I said false, it needs to exists in order for a globe earth model to work.

well no, what needs to exist is a reason why matter sticks together.

Again, you're assuming it already exists.

Do all globe earthers know is to go in circles?

Waste of time to debate

DOES WATER FLY INTO SPACE?

You're litteraly repeating the same thing when you have nothing to come up.

NO THATS WHY YOU NEED GRAVITY

IS THAT TOO HARD TO UNDERSTAND?

NO THAT'S WHY YOU NEED SOMETHING. WHICH HAS BEEN EXPLAINED BY GRAVITY.

IF YOU WANT TO DISPROVE GRAVITY, YOU'LL HAVE TO COME UP WITH A THEORY THAT EXPLAINS WHAT GRAVITY EXPLAINED AND THIGNS THAT GRAVITY DIDN'T EXPLAIN

SO THEN YOU NEED GRAVITY IN ORDER FOR IT TO EXIST? You're literally repeating yourself over and over and can't get over it.

You need something. We explained it as gravity.

But the shape is not ONLY explained by gravity

Thank you, WAS IT TOO HARD? you NEED gravity for globe earth model to work. Jesus christ, is it too hard to grasp?

so wtv gravity changes, you need to change EVERY OTHER thing that explains the shape as a sphere

ok how do you disprove gravity? do you need an alternate theory or do you just say "gravity hurts my feelings"?

Red herring, that wasn't what the discussion about. I'm glad you changed your mind at the end.

this was the entire discussion

are you trolling or are you this thick?

Entire discussion was you saying that you don't need gravity in order for globe earth to work. It wasn't about disproving the theory of gravity. Do you have reading problems?

the discussion is "you can't disprove globe earth by disproving gravity because there are other things that prove the earth is a globe"

I'm still glad you changed your mind at the end and FINALLY admitted you need gravity in order for it to work.

are you a bot?

Nice ad hominem

thanks, nice 100000 fallacies including ad hominems

At least you changed your mind at the end from your starting false premise. Glad I helped you be less ignorant 😃

I never changed my mind, i literally copy pasted from my previous messages

but i'm glad you see things differently, i guess you're a tiny bit less ignorant

Didn't you admit that you need gravity or something for water to stick thus disproving your first premise? It's fine man, don't be too stubborn about that cognitive dissonance

i've been saying that from the beginning. you even copy pasted the exact sentence. thanks for admitting that the only thing you know how to do is copy paste and insults

>Akhanyatin: Whether gravity exists or not, is irrelevant wtv replaces it will still assert that the earth is a globe 🤣

1st i don't use emotes
2nd asserting that it's a globe in this case means explaining why things stick to the globe.

does that clarify things for you to be able to copy paste?

>is irrelevant

Can you even read

LOL

wtv replaces it will still assert that the earth is a globe

Can you even read

LOL

this is called cherry picking