Explain how it makes a difference

Because if you just say it makes a difference without any argument in support you cant expect us to accept it

Polaris doesn’t move because it doesn’t move. Not because it’s to far away to see that it’s moving 😂

We SEE constellations move

The point is. We shouldn’t observe ANY constellations

We’re moving through infinite space at thousands of miles per hour.

There is no excuse.

bonus little piece of evidence, when you're walking along a straight road and look at the moon, it doesn't move, you don't see it get closer/further.
The moon is like 300 000km from us, that's 5 zeros, imagine adding another 10 zeros.

You are giving us no supportive argument whatsoever

You expect us to just take your word for it

And as you said

"infinite space"

Compared to the infinite the movement around the galaxy is meaningless

What supportive evidence do I need. The FACTS are constellations remain consistent and Polaris never moves. Common sense tells us spinning through a infinite universe we should observe random and non uniform stars.

So yeah

Alpha, it's fine, he's been debunked, he's just going to go around in circles from now

If you want to be an idiot and reject logic be my guest.

@Juicy J polaris is 4 000 000 000 000 000km from us, that's 15 zeros
when you're walking along a straight road and look at the moon, it doesn't move, you don't see it get closer/further.
The moon is like 300 000km from us, that's 5 zeros, imagine adding another 10 zeros.

but if you want to be an idiot and reject logic, be my guest.

That’s a baseless claim and assertion.

That Polaris is that far away.

right, ok, so now you're assuming that everything is local. the moon, the sun, the stars. that's a whole new argument

It still doesn’t change the facts that constellations remain consistent.

well yeah, they are consistent because they are far away

Why do we see uniform stars if we’re spinning through a infinite universe with millions of galaxies and stars.

you wanted an explanation, you've got one, if you reject it, the burden of proof is on you

because the stars are far away

i've said that already

It doesn’t matter how far away they are.

We’re supposed to be moving away from them. Lmao

Wtf don’t you get.

Nothing should be uniform.

when you're walking along a straight road and look at the moon, it doesn't move, you don't see it get closer/further.
The moon is about 300 000km from us, that's 5 zeros, imagine adding another 10 zeros.
what don't you understand

...

what? you want to argue that the sun and moon are local?

They clearly are.

right, if they were, we wouldn't have eclipses, seasons and we'd be able to see the sun from anywhere on earth, also, the earth wouldn't be 50% illuminated at all times

If the sun was millions of miles away it would be a IMPOSSIBILITY for sun rays to come out of clouds at an angle.

The sun and moon have been seen at the same time during a lunar eclipse so try again.

during solar eclipse

The sun is a spotlight.