yeah

i'm aware of that

but @H8mz88 was questioning how the "globe" earth was formed if gravity existed

yeah ?

yeah

yep.

"how is the globe earth formed"

so ?

so?

i just explained it to you

alright thx ?

the reason I use gravity as a way to challenge the flat earth theory is because it's a sound theory, and hasn't been disproven yet

you're welcome, i guess

There's two other explanations for gravity that I've heard. One, I'm not permitted to discuss here, as it's considered propaganda from a controlled opposition, and two, is density / buoyancy, where objects that are more dense than air are forced downward.

propaganda?

and forced downwards where?

forced downward relative to our position on earth.

so what about the sun then?

like, why isn't it forced downward, too?

and that's a similar theory to gravity, but without the universal application that gravity has

how does it move?

if you say it does

and what about the other planets?

and the moon?

it's a cosmic mystery - all lights in the firmament. No one can say what they really are. FEers will tell you they don't know.

ah

do you know what the moon and sun are for sure? have you been to either?

i'll be honest, it's impossible to completely debunk the idea of a flat earth

of course not

but i've seen both

That's the reasoning behind this.

and the "round" earth theory gives a perfectly legitimate explanation for how they move

yeah

absolutely

it's just that to me, the round earth theory seems more supported

but you can't completely prove either beyond doubt

short of us all going to space and seeing the earth from there

it's the same with religion

which is why it's far harder for an athiest to believe in the flat earth theory

i was just wondering how you supported your beliefs

Well, the heliocentric, globe earth model is certainly more supported. And, I suppose anything is possible, but there is *extremely* good evidence in support of a globe earth. It's why I never changed teams, haha.