Message from @SunRazor

Discord ID: 632016346988675085


2019-10-11 00:43:44 UTC  

Ok, but that doesn't change the heat of the thermosphere...

2019-10-11 00:43:45 UTC  

it's less dense in the upper atmosphere

2019-10-11 00:44:41 UTC  

density is extremely important here

2019-10-11 00:44:53 UTC  

The reason why spaceships do not burn up while leaving the atmosphere is that they are going the slowest at low altitudes where the air is densest and they only get to very high speeds when the atmosphere is very thin

2019-10-11 00:44:58 UTC  

If we are talking about the thermosphere, which receives radiation from the Sun, you must also realize that radiation also cools things down. Any object that is heated up will radiate that heat away, the hotter it gets the more heat it radiates per second. So as the Sun's input is constant, eventually the object will reach a temperature at which it is radiating the same amount of heat as it is absorbing. This is known as the "radiative equilibrium temperature". Part of satellite design and engineering is in minimizing the absorbed radiation from the sun, and maximizing the radiated radiation. There's whole books on the topic that you can read yourself actually

2019-10-11 00:45:02 UTC  

According to?

2019-10-11 00:45:22 UTC  

when the atmosphere is very thin, it's less molecules for the aircraft to push through, generating less heat

2019-10-11 00:45:27 UTC  

the ISS is like any other satelitte in this sense

2019-10-11 00:45:36 UTC  

Reptilian controlled.

2019-10-11 00:45:40 UTC  

The determination of the air density along the track of low-Earth-orbit (LEO) sat https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/full/10.2514/1.A34324ellite missions is possible by the recovery of the air drag force and momentum applying on the satellite.

2019-10-11 00:45:46 UTC  

reptilian controlled is shifting too far off the topic

2019-10-11 00:45:47 UTC  

stay on it

2019-10-11 00:46:23 UTC  

You refuse to accept new knowledge.

2019-10-11 00:46:27 UTC  

Very closed minded.

2019-10-11 00:46:32 UTC  

the thermosphere contributes barely to satellite damages due to radiative equilibrium temperature

2019-10-11 00:46:37 UTC  

insulting from you

2019-10-11 00:46:41 UTC  

which means you're running out of ground

2019-10-11 00:46:48 UTC  

either concede or continue without ad homs

2019-10-11 00:47:05 UTC  

It doesn't matter how many heat molecules linger in the thermosphere.

2019-10-11 00:47:11 UTC  

Besides, there's only one firmament anyway.

2019-10-11 00:47:19 UTC  

Prove the firmament exists

2019-10-11 00:47:21 UTC  

we're not talking about the firmament yet, keep on topic

2019-10-11 00:47:22 UTC  

You are using glober equations on a flat plane, of course they wont fit.

2019-10-11 00:47:27 UTC  

sun don't do that that's burden of proof

2019-10-11 00:47:34 UTC  

I just explained to you oakheart how the thermosphere doesnt burn up the ISS

2019-10-11 00:47:37 UTC  

once again shifting discussion oak

2019-10-11 00:47:37 UTC  

These equations were created by globers.

2019-10-11 00:47:40 UTC  

we're on the thermosphere

2019-10-11 00:47:47 UTC  

keep it together man

2019-10-11 00:48:02 UTC  

And I am discussing the equations you continuously bring up.

2019-10-11 00:48:07 UTC  

I can send you a 2D diagram on how the transfer of radiation works on satellites @🎃Oakheart🎃

2019-10-11 00:48:14 UTC  

If I used flat earth equations on a globe model, it wouldn't fit.

2019-10-11 00:48:24 UTC  

So how is this remotely making sense.

2019-10-11 00:48:30 UTC  

Use your senses and make empirical observations.

2019-10-11 00:48:34 UTC  

there aren't any flat earth equations

2019-10-11 00:48:36 UTC  

that I have seen

2019-10-11 00:48:39 UTC  

we're not on equations either

2019-10-11 00:48:46 UTC  

we're strictly on density in the thermosphere

2019-10-11 00:48:48 UTC  

stop shifting the goalposts

2019-10-11 00:48:48 UTC  

Explainations, equations, density.

2019-10-11 00:48:53 UTC  

All mathematics defined by globers.