I never stated that.

I know

I'm saying don't do that

Fair.

Ill link it again, the math is post-highschool so its not that bad: http://www.tak2000.com/data/Satellite_TC.pdf

"If I used flat earth equations on a globe model, it wouldn't fit.
So how is this remotely making sense." - you

it doesn't make sense, so I'm not going to believe it

don't do that in the future

You cant make math work in certain situations and not elsewhere

Decaying pressure as a function of altitude proves you don't need a firmament, and also logically predicts that if you keep going up, you will reach 'outer space' without ever needing to hit a firmament.

I'm not saying math wouldn't work, it just needs to be adjusted to fit this model, unless of course it has no relation to the earth's shape at all.

So a universal model perhaps.

One where the shape of the planet doesn't matter.

Newtonian mechanics works well for speeds much less than the speed of light

Newtonian mechanics loses accuracy as you deal with speeds comparable to the speed of light.

No, you cant literally derive these equations to a more rudimentary example. And the Fourier law and Planck's and Boltzmann's laws all apply in human life

You cant say that it is altered to fit the globe

it doesnt make sense

And so, equations or models serve as approximations.

And there are boundaries where one model or equation loses its accuracy and another model or equation takes over.

And so some equations are just good approximations that only work within certain boundaries

i will admit, black body calculations look like hieroglyphics if you dont know how they work

The only theoretically-true black body is a black hole.

This still doesn't explain why the earth is a globe, we are getting sidetracked.

So, black body calculations make good approximations

The main arguments for a globe are curvature (easily disputed), and the mathematics which we discussed.

No we arent, you were talking about ther thermosphere but then switched

But we can switch

but haha, sorry I mentioned black hole, because black holes are contradictions to them being black bodies

Black holes are interesting

No problem.

black holes are true black bodies in the sense they absorb 100% of the light coming in

but they are contradictions to black bodies because they do not radiate light

honestly, I don't think any scientists truly understands black holes even if they were real

yup their infrared emissivity is insane

Thats a huge moon, i hope thats not to scale

Hahaha not at all accurate.

Thats a mercator projection onto the flat earth which is false.

It's more like the UN logo, with an ice wall

Read explorers accounts of the ice wall.

they say the light from a black hole comes from the matter around the black hole, not the black hole itself