and their composition

yeah? do they take into consideration the face that clouds are droplets of water?

yeah, point a laser at water, change your angle and distance, and notice how the beam gets redirected

@Mathieus the Walking Witness you're so easy that I don't even need to google anything when I'm talking to you

@Teddy

yeah? and how does the local sun light 50% of the earth?

And for that Model Coincide with the real world time zones the sun would have to be way larger than actually isn't cover a larger area and would have to cut off halfway through the Earth which only works if its 1/2 spotlight witch would only work on a round earth

again, point a laser through water and see how it changes directions

Those light rays are traveling through a cardboard box which is not at all an accurate representation of the Earth's atmosphere

@Teddy or GE sun is far and the irregularly shaped clouds made of water droplets change the direction of the light in ways that appear like the sun is near

@Teddy yes, look at this. it would never happen on a globe earth

https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/images/49-refraction-of-light-in-water

well it clearly happens and the earth is not a disc, so yeah, it happens on a GE, you just need to think for half a second

ya so

look at shadows, perspective and refraction

yep, seems legit

WOoooooooOOOOOOoooo

nice

uh no

nope, proves that light interacts with water clouds

https://tenor.com/view/flat-earth-flat-earth-crazy-boats-gif-14060728

except your evidence is garbage

how are you not an FE zealot?

And the light rays from their perspective in that picture are curving around the Earth's atmosphere as it travels through the clouds refracting

https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/images/49-refraction-of-light-in-water

god

I've literally debunked your light tests every single time you've posted them, and you've ignored it.
explain to me how you're not an FE zealot who understands nothing of logical reasoning.

i alredy posted it

@Teddy you expect evidence from globe earther? he will resort to ad hominems and tell u that ur stupid if u believe in their model

@rivenator12113 EXCUSE ME? Ad homs? that's Mathieus specialty, I have yet to use them

@Akhanyatin provide @Teddy with evidence to your assertions please

e a r t h i s n o t f l a t

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9cUy6B--xc

@Teddy look at this

Why the hell would you want to create your own tests when people who are much more qualified and have much more qualified equipment or doing them

there not words

Isn't that the refraction wave thingys?