so a object made a wood, the tree has died, so the object is not living?

Not if it has died, to my knowledge. Even the guy who demonstrated the responses of different material wasn't able to give back life-like responses.

but rocks.. are just parts of bigger rocks

which are broken off

And a clone of a plant is just a broken limb.

so they aren't alive? or are only the giant ones alive?

But the clone still has life

Why can't a rock?

because rocks dont grow back

they are completely inanimate

Fair enough, I suppose not all would, but surely some if they still retain vibratory responses of life.

That's not true

They hold vibratory responses of life

Everything that vibrates has some sort of life

i don't usually trust scientists unless i can prove it

You can. He created his equipment and so can you

Let me get the name and you can make one

if it vibrates, i still wouldn't say that life is the correct work.

He didn't patent it so all can use his designs

if i find vibrations, great, but still, to use the word life is a stretch

Vibration and responses to thinks such as razors, chloroform, and poisons?

That seems like life to me

hm, thinking about it, it seems like thinking everything is alive would also be used to push the transhumanist agenda..

"oh, you're still a person if you upload yourself"

His device was called a Crescograph

I would never say that

im not gonna use the word life for vibrational frequencies in objects, however, what i WILL say

Ever

is that it proves God, a creator

No objection there

after all, God did speak everything into existence in the Bible

so a vibrational frequency would make sense.

😋

Correct

Hello Nomad!

but, it also clearly seperates the fact that the living are unique

Hello

which is why i wouldn't put myself on the same level as a rock

i can think and act, and do things

i have breath.

Fair enough, but I disagree.