Blood Eagle death

Search in Google about Blood Eagle death

I ruined your day 😆👌

U really searched about this

Not particularly. And, no.

I haven't.

Then search ane see images

From what I gathered it will not be pleasant to look at, so I will not.

@Wolfgang Amadeus Yurmom's art Objective. Natural is the baseline for all existing moralities that people follow. Some are just wrong. There is a logical and spiritual side to it.

Ah, I thought you meant natural law as in survival of the fittest.

Search in Google :. Blood Eagle death

No thanks

Do it

Or search Momo challenge

Don’t promote gore, please.

Sounds cool

It's pretty metal ngl

Search now and thank me later

I still believe that morality is subjective. Natural law is objective based on human behaviors.

Morals can be interpreted in different ways based on one person's beliefs, but natural law is the general moral behaviorism of all humans.

No. Objective based on logic. Deontological ethics

Spiritually lines up with how the universe functions

Aka karma

That is a subjective observance.

How is it subjective? Observation of nature is not subjective.

Observation of human behavior is objective, but the method of interpretation of observation of nature and how nature functions and what drives it is subjective. It is a subjective logic.

Logic is not subjective.
There is no "my logic" or "your logic" there is only logic

There is such a thing as 'my logic' and 'your logic'. This is subjective logic. There is also an objective logic that is universal in truth, based on science.

(and mathematics)

Obviously i am referring to objective logic if im making an objective claim

Of course.

Then why evade my point?

I'm saying that moral law is subjective because it ties into the idea that there is a God. It ties into the idea that moral law is ingrained into humans, which I disagree with. That is not objective. I'm not trying to evade your point.

Then think of it as universal law. It still applies and is observable. It is ingrained in people because we have the mental power to comprehend it. It is objective. There is law to the universe.

It is a *perceived* law of the universe. It is not inherently objective because people believe it is a universal law.

It can be proven to be objective. Which is why i mentioned deontological ethics

How can it be proven, in a logical fashion that follows science or mathematics, that it is objective?

Yes. That what i was saying

I gtg. I have to get up early. Ill talk to you later.

Adios

> But morality is a social construct.
@Wolfgang Amadeus Yurmom's art is it? Is it really?