That's just plain false.

https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/first-circumnavigation-via-both-poles-surface

@rivenator12113 ikr that second picture just doesn’t work on a heliocentric earth

Lol

Why on earth would the sky look like that??

@rivenator12113 funny how Polaris debunks the globe
Good stuff

debunking globetards 😃

You're comparing the movement of 8 hours of timelapse to 365 days of rotation?

Polaris wouldn’t even be there if the earth is a ball
It is impossible according to the model
Same with constellations

You mean Polaris as the north pole star?

🤔

Of course Polaris would still be there

No

It would not on a spinning ball

It would be somewhere else or we wouldn’t see it at all

Same with the constellations
It is impossible to keep seeing the same constellations for thousands of years on a ball

Straight up

More globe fantasy

You've greatly misjudged how far away the other stars are. You're simply *guessing* that they would move that much. The stars do move over time - there's a whole branch of science dedicated to stellar parallax. If the earth were immobile, there wouldn't be ANY parallax.

No

Yup

We would not see the constellations anymore as we are flying through space on your model

Why not?

Oml

Yea you don’t know your model

I do, actually. I've looked into cosmology extensively.

If you did
You wouldn’t even be asking that

Don't we see new constellations everyday?

Funny how globies don't even research their own model, it would never work with the polaris star. COINCIDENTALLY ON THE NORTH POLE

At the same spot?

The stars DO move.

As I mentioned