Message from @Pwnelius
Discord ID: 614943422943330327
<:trolled:555217274907262976>
<:tp:507990258055381024>
<:GWmercyUltraSweat:405753180509700106>
<:uh_duhh:583617741684998154>
<:happycube:507990858960732162>
<:happycube:507990858960732162>
<:happy:507991686320750592>
<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>
😄
<:angrycube:507990207602229249>
<:honkler:596885550238007336>
Ahhh the nazi clown
Nice
stonks
hello all
so guys we did yeTi is gone
This question of the day is pretty bad
It’s not even a question
n0pe
*Proceeds to to tell us exactly what it is*
i mean now i know what it is tho
s o s t o n k s
Also, this isn’t even a paradox
Humanity is a paradox
😔
🙏
a seemingly absurd or self-contradictory statement or proposition that when investigated or explained may prove to be well founded or true. defention of a paradox
Enjoy this paraducks
AHHHHH
@The Loftus Nerd this idea that he posed is not a paradox, it only contradicts the model. In order to be a paradox the statement has to contradict itself, which this does not.
“This is statement is false” is a paradox because it’s self contradicting
i was agreeing with yoU chief
“The entire sky should be lit like the sun is” is not a paradox
The entire sky should just die. Set it ablaze I say. Give us the inferno!
Ignoring the fact that this idea makes no sense, it proves how little understanding that the inventor of this concept actually has.
@Pwnelius t ell me how it doesen't work chief
i wanna steal i mean borrow permanently your arguments
Well firstly, stars are spaced incredibly far apart, and therefore would not be all orange.
And secondly, the sky would not be completely lit because many stars would be so far away that the light of said stars had not reached us yet