Message from @Citizen Z
Discord ID: 616390032994861303
I'm reffering to general, not special, relativity
As that's what actually deals with gravity
Sure it does
"no u"
What a comeback
Super cool info there
VwV
Check it out
That's a bibliography about again time dialation in special relativity
I'm seriously wondering if you know the difference
We sharing reading material?
oof I don't have image perms
now wait
yea?
@Citizen Z also
You never responded to me last time
if gravity doesn't exist, what's the explanation behind gravitational time dilation
I presented you an experiment and confirmation of GR
And you said "I've never seen it before so I'll look"
Then never talked about it again
What experiment
Who wants to talk about gravimeters? 😃
I do
nice
What do you think they prove
Have you ever used one?
Well they prove that mass attracts mass
And they measure that attraction
with a super duper sensitive spring device
They buried 5 tons of lead in the ground, then they used this super sensitive spring device called a gravimeter and moved it slowly horizontally over it. When more mass is under it, the spring compresses more. I'd show a graph, but I don't have image permissions, so here's a link to the tests they did. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC110440/jrc110440_technical_note_preparatory_tests_2016-17.pdf
I have never used one
Have you heard of the Allias Effect
No
Abstract
Conventional explanations for observations of anomalous behaviour of mechanical
systems during solar eclipses are critically reviewed. These observations include the work
of Allais with paraconical pendula, those of Saxl and Allen with a torsion pendulum and
measurements with gravimeters. Attempts of replications of these experiments and recent
gravimeter results are discussed and unpublished data by Latham and by Saxl et al. is
presented. Some of the data are summarized and re-analyzed. Especially, attention is paid
to observations of tilt of the vertical, which seems to play an important role in this matter
and recommendations for future research are given. It is concluded that all the proposed
conventional explanations either qualitatively or quantitatively fail to explain the
observations.
Thanks for the info
Haven't they failed to recreate this effect so far?
Yeah np. Ty also