Message from @maciospy

Discord ID: 616393907596427309


2019-08-28 22:00:54 UTC  

@Citizen Z you do realize atomic clocks existed before einstein right

2019-08-28 22:00:57 UTC  

But I'll read more

2019-08-28 22:01:04 UTC  

It's still interesting

2019-08-28 22:01:15 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/616391879092863008/Screenshot_20190828-150110_Chrome.jpg

2019-08-28 22:01:31 UTC  

@Shadow✓ they dont prove anything

2019-08-28 22:02:05 UTC  

still no answer to my question

2019-08-28 22:02:06 UTC  

whatever

2019-08-28 22:03:01 UTC  

@Citizen Z is that your best response

2019-08-28 22:03:15 UTC  

The paper you sent seemed to assume that all atomic clocks rely on the speed of light

2019-08-28 22:03:51 UTC  

I can easily show this paper doesn't negate anything considering we have atomic clocks earlier than einstein's theory was even developed and they worked without assumptions of lightspeed

2019-08-28 22:04:00 UTC  

I'm not even going to bother with reading the actual paper

2019-08-28 22:04:45 UTC  

Besides, they do prove that atomic clocks at higher altitudes (farther away from earths core in the globe model) tick at a different rate than those closer. In accordance with general relativity and with gravity.

2019-08-28 22:04:53 UTC  

Not to mention, that's only a single proof of GR.

2019-08-28 22:05:29 UTC  

I can name many, many more, and besides even if general relativity was proven incorrect it's not like density is plausible as an alternative.

2019-08-28 22:06:48 UTC  

Density/buoyancy as replacement for gravity is *easily* disproven.

2019-08-28 22:06:58 UTC  

A little common sense goes a long way

2019-08-28 22:07:50 UTC  

nice like/dislike ratio

2019-08-28 22:08:31 UTC  

A video could have a million likes. Doesnt mean its true

2019-08-28 22:09:14 UTC  

I have a good example of trickery in videos but many didnt see it.

2019-08-28 22:09:19 UTC  

ok

2019-08-28 22:09:24 UTC  

Let me find

2019-08-28 22:10:50 UTC  

I have a somewhat distantly related question. Should I put it here or in another channel?

2019-08-28 22:12:06 UTC  

So...this video, at first glance tends to give credit to some coriolis force. But all the lady is doing is a magic trick. She is pouring the water into the sink at in a certain side of the sink to make the water flow a certain way. Closely analyzing this and it becomes clear this is a trick.
https://youtu.be/4IIVfoDuVIw

2019-08-28 22:12:27 UTC  

@SiliconBassist you can post your questions in here.

2019-08-28 22:12:36 UTC  

Look at like/dislike ratio

2019-08-28 22:12:37 UTC  

Okay

2019-08-28 22:12:56 UTC  

The notion itself is true though

2019-08-28 22:12:59 UTC  

well, at least I know its fake

2019-08-28 22:13:03 UTC  

28k likes. That means 28k ppl were tricked

2019-08-28 22:13:18 UTC  

3.4 million views

2019-08-28 22:13:28 UTC  

That video was probably faked but the thing it was talking about does actually happen

2019-08-28 22:13:29 UTC  

Likely millions tricked

2019-08-28 22:13:41 UTC  

@Death9Reaper no it doesnt

2019-08-28 22:14:08 UTC  

I haved done the experiment with some friends in Australia and different parts of the world

2019-08-28 22:14:10 UTC  

If you pour water into a container it will stay in motiom for weeks

2019-08-28 22:14:14 UTC  

It does work

2019-08-28 22:14:30 UTC  

No it doesnt

2019-08-28 22:14:38 UTC  

I have seen it before

2019-08-28 22:15:08 UTC  

This mathematician debunked it

Miles Mathis THE CORIOLIS EFFECT DECONSTRUCTED : http://milesmathis.com/corio.html

2019-08-28 22:15:11 UTC  

There was this popular science account on twitter that made a lot of false explanations for things observed in videos. I forget what it was called