```If the object is distant enough, its angular size approaches zero, and the object appears to shrink to a point. Angular resolution is the smallest angular size that is still recognizable by an optical system.

The angular resolution of a human eye is about one arcminute or about 0.017°. If an object has the angular resolution smaller than one arcminute, our eye would not be able to recognize the object.

To increase the object’s angular size, we have to approach the object. Or we can use an optical aid, like a telescope or a binocular. These will improve angular size, and objects with smaller angular size will be easier to discern.

A receding object has a continuously diminishing angular size. If its angular size goes below the limit of our angular resolution, the object will no longer be recognizable. If there’s no barrier, the object would appear whole the entire time until its angular size is too small for us to recognize. In this case, we say the object disappears because of perspective.

In other cases, a receding object appears whole at first, then at some point, a portion of it becomes unseen, and as it goes farther, more of it becomes unseen, all while leaving the rest of the object visible. Such cases are not the result of perspective. The angular size of the object is still higher than our angular resolution. The object gradually becomes unseen because of obstruction from another object, like the curvature of the Earth.

```

this one is out of focus too?

faking a comet

@RidleyChozo Yes.

Clearly.

Instead of spamming videos, do you mind coming up with an argument?

boy oh boy thats kind of a bit out there

and this one, taken with the same telescope?

I think he is a mouth piece for that website

promoting more globe lies

@RidleyChozo Better focused than the other objects for sure. How do you know they were taken with the same telescope?

This is the best sphere earth argument
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyD8VIK032o

There are so many ways to prove the earth is a globe but yall would just go like "OHH THAT'S FAKE THAT'S LIES"

all p900 telescopic photographs

same camera w/ same zoom

maybe you should do your own research instead of being gullable and uneducated @shudzy.

CGI photo that I can in blender is not proof of round earth.

captures the form of Saturn

Give us evidence

captures the form of Venus

Have yall ever seen ships sail off to see

debunks ever argument

sea*

Stop promoting your channel, we want arguments

u litteraly deleted my video...

I've personally zoomed in and brought ships that have gone over the horizon back again.

i didnt upload it

Also, That's not how it works

just because someothing goes out of view doesn't mean you cannot bring it back again.

You watched it, you should be able to describe the contents of it

No?

its better to just watch it

I live on the coastline near a big island. It is partially hidden beneath the curverture of the earth and i can't see it's beaches

Even though I've been there and it indeed does have beaches

I have watched a ton of globe lies, one more video will not convince me that the preponderance of evidence I have already watched is innacurate

Do you have any measurements done instead of anecdotal evidence?

there are thousands and thousands of proofs for flat earth, and not one good proof for a globe.

There's TONS of good proofs for globe earth

Indeed lol, they watch all those videos and can't come up with a single arguments

globe earth lies?