take vid and share

@.𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭 They are always more expensive than the flight path used for flat earth because it take more fuel and it costs more.

because you can;t be bothered to test this yourself, i take it?

I did and provided evidence. your turn

you did not provide evidence

ok you're gonna get banned

you're not that stupid

and besides it's daytime and i don;t give that much of a care about this

@.𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭 Again, how much does that cost more than the one for NZ>US> Chile

they dont go to the us its non stop

you're on a flat earther server, dude. calling someone else stupid is out the window

@^Kevin^ why did ripter get muted?

yet here we are

I don;t understand how this is beyond you

@.𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭 I'm comparing both, the one that takes the direct path is more expensive than the one that goes to the US then to Chile 🤔

use a telescope and you get clearer images

a telescope was used. I'm sorry you have cognitive dissonance

theres no airliner companys that have flights to aus to south africa becuase the demad isnt there so they fly to dubia and transfer flights

https://assets.mspimages.in/gear/gif%20(27).gif

there used to be one tho

Do you have any source that the demand is lower?

Baseless claims

a telescopic mount on a camera is not the same as an actual telescope since *all that does is increase the size of the image on a camera and does not have nearly as much resolving power*

good lord

cute story

Faulklands has 3 flights PER DAY... why do you want them to fly to new zealand... just for you

i guess i was wrong there are non stop flights LOL

there you go

how was the 2nd pic taken. what camera

telescope

not a camera

🤦

keep being in denial

could be any camera

you are clinically insane

Alright I found a telescope

@.𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭 Yes and the direct flights are more epensive. But I wasn't talking from australia to africa, we were talking about australia to chile don't switch LOL

Those exist