Message from @the21cat

Discord ID: 619910746855309322


2019-09-07 14:39:12 UTC  

lil hottie

2019-09-07 14:39:15 UTC  

ok

2019-09-07 14:39:40 UTC  

Morning @gooeySlimey

2019-09-07 14:40:06 UTC  

oh hey goodmorning

2019-09-07 14:41:08 UTC  

I'm watching videos on type systems

2019-09-07 14:41:46 UTC  

@gooeySlimey morning. 😃

2019-09-07 14:43:40 UTC  

FOLLOW @EXPosing_mass_deception on instagream

2019-09-07 14:44:02 UTC  

follow exposing_mass_deception

2019-09-07 14:48:14 UTC  

**Question of The Day #190**

What do you think would happen to the forests if the carbon dioxide (CO2) levels were reduced from .04% to .03%?

Tell us what you think in the <#484514023698726912> 😃

2019-09-07 14:51:14 UTC  

I doubt it CO2 levels will get reduced though, it's way more likely that they'll rise

2019-09-07 15:00:28 UTC  

the short answer is The World system would correct / balance itself as it always does

2019-09-07 15:00:36 UTC  

It probably would have a negligable effect on land plants and would be slightly advantageous to almost all sea life because the oceans would become slightly less acidic. But only then if it continued to drop

2019-09-07 15:02:24 UTC  
2019-09-07 15:02:44 UTC  

How did they measure c02 levels in the year 1000

2019-09-07 15:03:15 UTC  

predicted measurement

2019-09-07 15:03:27 UTC  

za warudo funny joke

2019-09-07 15:03:27 UTC  

So basically guess work

2019-09-07 15:03:46 UTC  

Weird that the moment we actually started measuring the chart went up

2019-09-07 15:03:55 UTC  

🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔

2019-09-07 15:03:56 UTC  

nobody cares about 1000, just look at the past century

2019-09-07 15:03:59 UTC  

They use pillars of ice they cut out from the north or south pole in short and find the carbon levels for that time based on how far down the ice they go

2019-09-07 15:04:08 UTC  

oh smart

2019-09-07 15:04:28 UTC  

Im gonna call bs on that chart chief

2019-09-07 15:05:17 UTC  

Ok but do it as you like good luck denying ocean acidification

2019-09-07 15:05:28 UTC  

they made it up

2019-09-07 15:05:37 UTC  

like they do with just about everything

2019-09-07 15:05:43 UTC  

Im not saying global warming is bs

2019-09-07 15:05:48 UTC  

Just that that chart is

2019-09-07 15:06:01 UTC  

.03% would be the ideal, we're at .04% only because we don't have enough trees

2019-09-07 15:06:20 UTC  

Im sure its just mind control technology

2019-09-07 15:06:25 UTC  

The earth is flat. Noobs,

2019-09-07 15:07:25 UTC  

And even if global warming is bs we still need to stop poluting so much

2019-09-07 15:07:33 UTC  

@.-. You sound more like a troll than a flat earther to me.

2019-09-07 15:09:21 UTC  

Why do they always make it so obvious

2019-09-07 15:09:54 UTC  

Like how the shellfish are grown in eastern Wa pools because the acids kills their earlier stages. Corals are adapting to the acidic nature by building without their protective coating but then get desteoyed by cyclones. The marine economy is starting to fail in several places because of this

2019-09-07 15:09:55 UTC  

sure but pollution is literally the reason for an increase of CO2 levels?

2019-09-07 15:10:48 UTC  

And the prediction is within the next century we lose 1/3 of all species of sea life

2019-09-07 15:11:06 UTC  

sounds fun

2019-09-07 15:11:13 UTC  

can't wait

2019-09-07 15:12:34 UTC  

yea

2019-09-07 15:12:47 UTC  

at least itll leave more space for our ocean cities