you guys have been trolling me since i posted that video spouting nonsense

what?

is your defention for trolling

🤔

🤔

Also when ever they get their studies against vaccines published not only to they lose their license but they also get their published papers branded as false with no further specifications. I want you to look at with a neutral POV and tell me there isn't a crusade against anti-vaxxers doctors

i agree there is a crusade against anti vax doctors but the reason why is because people dont belive medicine that isn't grounded in science some anti vax doctors do crystals things like that which is why which gives everyone else a bad stigma

Noice

I’m sure that if there were vaccines during the bubonic plague people would have been happier

They dont regect it because its againsed vaccines

They regect it because the process is unscientific

Bubonic plague and most viruses are related to extreme unsanitary conditions. We live in a first world country where sanitary conditions are very good. It will never happen

if its false
Its more likely to be caused by either ignorance of the scientific method or of bias

I am hypocritical

I am hypocritical..

I am hypocritical

we all are sometimes

we try to avoid it the best we can

Do we

I do

Not everyone tho

the modern meaning of hypocritical means saying what you dont believe

Why is it unscientific?

Define “unscientific”

hypocritical translates to hypo critical
less than critical or subcritical

dosnt really fit the modern deffinition that well

@Σ5 ''They reject it because the process is unscientific'' They only said it was due to procedural errors, undisclosed financial conflicts of interest, and ethical violations without any further specifications.

Lacking critical thinking

@rivenator12113 procediral errors make it unscientific
Wether they where intentional or unintentional hasnt been said

Plague can be brought by vectors like rats, they don’t have that sanitary condition

also you said regect
Not the thing about him being stripped

Isn't it also lacking critical thinking to say these terms without any further specification where was it unscientific in the study?

But you know, even every medicine you take could use a method that is “unscientific”

theyprobably say where somewhere

Nowhere do they provide further specifications on these terms.

Also if you think someones paper is just junk and stupid i bet you wouldnt have the time to point out where

too much to write down

I'm talking for the anti-vaxxer paper, they labeled it those things but didn't provide any further explanation, that's very lacking of critical thinking if you agree with those terms.

Hypocritical

how

If I said you were mentally retarded and I had no further specifications or explanations as to why you were mentally retarded, would you believe me? Same thing they are doing with the anti-vaxxer paper, they are calling it all these labels with no explanations nor any further specifications as to why they are these terms. You are lacking of critical thinking because you actually agreed with those terms when they didn't specify where in the paper there were ''procedural errors, undisclosed financial conflicts of interest, and ethical violations''.