Ohb

Uhh

Yes?

The earth is a huge gaping kitty

and another says this
`Even though we observed a modest increase in risk of prostate cancer associated with higher
levels of IGF-I, and a slight reduced risk with higher levels of IGFBP-3, neither of these
peptides are likely to be useful as additional measurements in prostate cancer PSA
screening. The strength of the associations are too weak to have any value as a screening
test, because at these odds ratios, the detection rate (sensitivity) is less than 8% for a 95%
specificity (5% false positive rate) [3;74]. This issue has been investigated by Oliver et al.
who found no evidence that measures of IGFs or IGFBPs enhanced the specificity of
prostate cancer detection beyond that achievable by the currently used free/total PSA index
[75]. Future research should be aimed at clarifying the associations of IGF-II, IGFBP-2 and
IGFBP3 with prostate cancer, in large prospective studies`
@kino
I repeat *higher* levels
even then his cited studies dont back him. Read paper before you cite a child could debunk them

Waiting to be feed a hotdog

I think earth is a woman just wanting to spread it's legs

Hmm i see

Tfw ecosexuals dominate the chat

Wut

Hmm

@SiliconBassist the chat is dead asf

Smh

@everyone talk or Hitler comes back

aw the I AM guy is gone

I see

@everyone Talk or everyone here will become a virgin including me

Hmm

So guys

Is anyone alive

@SiliconBassist

@SiliconBassist hey baby hmmm

beep boop

Hmm

hmm

🐪

@The_chickenmaster

@indio007

🐐

@Emma 😝

What u want

So you FOK goats? Hmmm @SiliconBassist

<:worried:485147448503697421>

Suspicious

🤔

Who doesnt tbh

uh oh 😳

Somebody’s projecting

Hmmm

Hmmm