oh

no im not trying to start an arguement over beliefs

if i wanted to do that id start a flat earth arguement

i was just reading a lot of threads on twitter about global warming and it's a bit

global warming works just as well

idk, its very old ppl v younger people

what harm does moving to renewable power sources do?

is it a bad idea to move away rfom coal fired power plants?

its only debated against cause its expensive and doesnt produce as much energy as coal and all that jazz, i believe

There's already so much invested in it

it creates jobs, it's completely renewable etc etc

i find for example, that when the effects of 5g upon nature are brought up to climate activists they could care less

yeah its just super expensive for the whole process

But of course, why not move to renewable energy?

to switch to renewable

ima use australia as an example

Once a fusion reactor is built, though, we won't have to worry about energy ever again.

we have so much unused land that recieves so much sunlight

once we build spaceships that can travel near the speed of light we wont need to worry about earth

i didnt want to discuss the cult of climate change in the first place

huh

https://freedomofmind.com/bite-model/

techniques cults use

i dont understand what youre saying

just because an idea or issue has a following doesnt mean it's a cult

Destructive mind control can be determined when the overall effect of these four components promotes dependency and obedience to some leader or cause; it is not necessary for every single item on the list to be present.

so everyone who drinks water is part of a cult

> dependency and obedience to some leader or cause

now youre being ridiculous

no im using it as an example

dont drink and we die

false example

theyre not false?

theyre true examples

dont drink = we die
planet warms to unsustainable temps

= we die

the biological need to drink water is not a valid example

okok

dont wear clothes in antarctica = we die

again

clothes are not a biological need