Message from @tekashi
Discord ID: 626595114525130755
ok
Why not? Make them learn what our amendment is. You can sue them after they hit you lol
They will probably charge you higher than origionally
Also follow their orders and don't be stupid, if you don't they will have reason to beat your ass
I mean, if you do that you'll definitely make sure they try and find something to arrest you for.
Ok. This story is just wacko. 😂
@The Gwench it'll happen in America
Ffs
Thankfully I want that here
People are so f--king slow
Like MOVE OUT OF MY WAY
helo
goodbye
Hello... it's me
hello love you
bye
Hi me
😁
Hello
love you
goodbye
If you think that’s just about a shirt, you are hilarious.
“
two felony hate crime counts for berating and questioning the citizenship of a woman who was wearing a shirt emblazoned with a design of the Puerto Rican flag”
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-puerto-rican-flag-trial-20190925-gk4ew64pdnaxvbriud6wbd265u-story.html%3FoutputType%3Damp
Fish are gay
Interesting how headlines deliberately hide key parts of the story
Almost like that generates more clicks
aaaaaaa
Yeah, that’s what you get with Fox News lolol
With everything just about
It’s not like it was a white lady in a Puerto Rican flag shirt all butt hurt about having her fashion choices criticized...
But they leave out key parts of the story because it generates more outrage
felony (n.)
c. 1300, "treachery, betrayal; deceit; villainy, wickedness, sin, crime; violent temper, wrath; ruthlessness; evil intention," from Old French felonie (12c.) "wickedness, evil, treachery, perfidy, crime, cruelty, sin," from Gallo-Roman *fellonia, from fellonem "evil-doer" (see felon).
For Fox News, sure. Took 4 seconds to find a more complete story.
Wait the fox article didn’t have that information at all?
That’s ridiculous
Not sure. Whoever posted it above just posted a screenshot to take snipes at liberals.
@Cosmonaut! youre making an acussation
So, cherry picking to fit their agenda. Probably didn’t read the article, just saw what confirmed their bias and ran with it