Message from @rivenator12113
Discord ID: 628255903875072052
Ripperoni
👌
Lol. Whose laughing now? 😂
it depends on your deffinition of exponent I supose
waowaowoaiawoaowoowowoowow
He's spamming stabilizer
in type theory I think function types (analagous to exponents) don't even have a set cardinality at 0 0
Actually I think it's 1
^0 isnt a theory tho its just a rule
there are functions from 0 to 0 but idk if it has one function
@The_chickenmaster rules = deffinitional
Not axiomatic
Idk what axiomatic means
Axiom is an assumption in a formal system
😱
I just know that thats just something thats agreed upon by the mathamitcal comunity
Nothing to see???
🤔
one that is usually truested thru reason/induction
an axiom is a definite first truth in a formal system
Cool story
What's the odds
Do the math einstein
some guy I talked to long ago argued that axioms are horrible because it's just a blind unproven assumption
And that he bases his reason on truth not assumption
🤔
Wut
ALL of the stars are about the same size too??? None of them are 10-20-30 times larger even though they are vastly different distances and sizes???
the thing is that all systems of logic have axioms
Axioms are unavoidable
logic itself has axioms
keep in mind, all the stars (other than the sun) are also several trillion km away
@Ronsheckelson a lot don't make sense does it
@rivenator12113 i disagree thats def a coincidence
the law of excluded middle is an axiom
One that I actually regect in some.cases
type theory regects the law of excluded middle
river
The world is dark and nothing will ever be the same
Stars are the same size?
