was that a psyop?

I wouldn't say it was based on what we know about it if I'll be honest

It just showed how easy people are to believe what they hear without actual evidence of it's existence

i would argue that it had the effect of a psyop

and it was broadcast propaganda

You're right about that for sure and I agree but I don't think it was a government plan to do so

why not?

I'd mainly say due to the time of year it was

that doesnt sound logical

Why's that?

youre using the time of year to justify your disagreement about whether the government did that intentionally

thats not logical, at least as best as i can tell

You're right

I shouldn't use the time of year to justify my claim that it couldn't be it

FranToday at 8:32 PM
lul
science doesn't prove

jeremyToday at 8:32 PM
pseudoscience doesnt prove

FlarfToday at 8:33 PM
@jeremy do you think forces cause objects to move?

FranToday at 8:33 PM
only philosophy and math proves

jeremyToday at 8:33 PM
science proves ur hypothesis

@Dear Mason time of the year does matter

But it also doesn't have the feel of an actual psyop would or should like we see with the Area 51 event @Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids

Administration of the governmant is important

sorry i had to paste that read the part where he says science doesnt prove philosophy and math proves lol

They are the ones who control the governmant

mason, i disagree

@Abe Lover I had my year wrong so no I was going to talk about ww2 but the radio broadcast was a year before that war even started

perhaps it could be said that it was different

prove in the sense of philosophy and mathematics has far more rigourous requirements than in any other subject

It is logically required if it is proven in math or philosophy

No other discipline does this

dude u said science doesnt prove math and philosophy proves lol we are done ur too far gone

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids and it was different there is a great different between the internet and the radio

u told me u dont need an independent variable in a science experiemtn

that's like the comon consensus of most philosophers of science

mason i agree

Hold on I need to be right back

u also told me that because speed makes clocks tell time different it proves gravity i mean i cant take much more without getting triggered lol

I never told you that

<:bahahaha:485147430740951041>

flarf did

I don't think science tries to prove claims

@Fran i agree

In the rigorous sense of the term

science proves or disproves ur hypothesis

MISCONCEPTION: Science proves ideas.
CORRECTION: Journalists often write about "scientific proof" and some scientists talk about it, but in fact, the concept of proof — real, absolute proof — is not particularly scientific. Science is based on the principle that any idea, no matter how widely accepted today, could be overturned tomorrow if the evidence warranted it. Science accepts or rejects ideas based on the evidence; it does not prove or disprove them. To learn more about this, visit our page describing how science aims to build knowledge.