<:huh:430293888071368704>

Interesting lol

it's been a busy weekend

😂

<:lolol:430293779472318475>

its 5 am east coast and pam just crashing out

I been going for like 30 hours plus

sleep calls soon

Agreed

@D3M0_Anon No someone woke him up problems in 24/7

😴

@hurracanekatrina

@SighOperator good one exactly 👌

@D3M0_Anon not sure what it was I came in on the tail end. Read what I said above.

Hurricane

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1025790600736649216?s=19

Hay hay

You have gained a rank @hurracanekatrina, you just advanced to 3 . Thanks for all you do Patriot!

Your e's are a's?

👋🏻

Morning @ʙɪɴᴀʀʏ ᴀɢᴇɴᴛ🐉🦋

mo'nin'

WARRANTS:
“It is the duty of every person who is charged with the execution of process to explain what would otherwise be a trespass, by showing his warrant and his official character. If he choose to conceal these, he puts himself outside of the protection they give him, and becomes, in the eye of all to whom he refuses to state them, an aggravated trespasser… and he who withholds such information not only takes all the risk of being treated as an insolent trespasser, but is guilty of bringing odium on the law of which he is the unworthy minister.” State ex rel. v. Claudius, 1 Mo. Ap., 551; Barton v. Wilkinson, 18 Vt., 186.

“A warrant of commitment must be in writing, under the hand and seal of the magistrate and express the causes of the commitment, in order to be examined into (if necessary) upon habeas corpus. If there be no cause expressed the gaoler is not bound to detain the prisoner; for the law judges in this respect, saith Sir Edward Coke, like Festus the Roman governor, that it is unreasonable to send a prisoner, and not to signify withal the crimes against him.” Sir William Blackstone, 1 Black. Com., 187.

“The question is, what authority has the jailer to detain him? To ascertain this we must look at the warrant of commitment only. It is that only which can justify his detention. That warrant states no offense. It does not allege that he was convicted of any crime. It states merely that he had been brought before a meeting of many Justices, who had required him to find sureties for his good behavior. It does not charge of their own knowledge or suspicion, or upon the oath of any person whomsoever… The judges of this court unanimously of opinion that the warrant of commitment was illegal for want of stating some good cause certain, supported by oath.” Chief Justice Marshall, Ex parte Burford 3 Cranch, 448.

“That where a warrant cannot legally issue without oath, but is so issued, all the parties concerned in the arrest under such process are trespassers.” Gold v. Bissell, 1 Wendell, 218.

The judicial officer must exercise his or her own judgment and not act on the judgment of the accuser, and probable cause does not exist for the issuance of a warrant unless the judicial officer is convinced from the complaint that there is reasonable ground to suspect that the accused is guilty of the offense. People v. Greer, 91 Ill. App.3d 304 (1980).

They have a server for JA now.

For him?

Kim dot com started up a server for him last weekish

Yes

JA?

Been on it

Assange

I "know" an admin from Twitter

JA has internet now?

Unity4J

not that I know

@ʙɪɴᴀʀʏ ᴀɢᴇɴᴛ🐉🦋 do you have it?

https://discord.gg/Xgv9Ug

JA server

Why’s he have a server

💩 ❓

there