You solve equations from an abundance of evidence to get the answer

Ok

is that evidence that I have eye problems or is it proof?

Both

The glasses are evidence you have an eye problem

it is not proof because maybe I simply like how they look

Ok

So what does that analogy have to do with what I said about evolution

Are the scientists lying about the evidence

Is that what you’re getting at

My point is I guess how do I know that the links referred to in fossil records aren't just another species unrelated but similar in bone structure

it's more about evidence

Because

just because their is an abundance of evidence does mean their is absolute proof

Things are only similar because they are related

We are similar to chimpanzees because we are related

Koala and panda... related?

Yes

Everything is related

whale and shark?

Yes

man and a trout?

Yes

We share 60 percent of the same DNA with a banana

and all with a common ancestor?

Yes

Everything has a common ancestor

But no absolute proof for any of this

Yes

The human genome project was launched in like the late 90’s or early 2000’s where they compared our dna with other species

We share dna with everything alive on earth

What you have shown me only qualifies as evidence

We share 99 percent the same dna as a chimpanzee

Look up the human gnome project

There’s your evidence

But once again it would make sense as well to design it that way

Absolutely. But the evidence doesn’t need a designer. Life is all strung up together in this beautiful family tree and there is evidence for it. You talk about love and beauty. There is nothing more beautiful and more humbling to me then knowing that I share relatives with everything on earth. That the color of a mans skin or where he is from does not matter we humans are all brothers and sisters in the end and we are cousins with all life on earth.

To me that is where I get a religious chill from and where I can get a hypothetical spirituality from. And the best part about it all is that it is all true

I know but the evidence does negate the possibility of a creator

doesn't**

No