All I’m saying is that masturbation and sex is still great without a foreskin lol

If you think about it it's the orgasm this great and not the ACT. The with a mutilated member can be frustrating because of the loss of sensitivity

of course its still great

but as someone with one, i can tell you the sensitivity is insane

Every girl I’ve talked to about this has said that they prefer a circumcised dick. Now I have not talked to many girls about this but in high school it was said a lot. So it certainly isn’t a Jewish thing anymore it’s definitely more of a status quo type thing

And there also could be medical benefits from it

this preference could be cultural, a culture where its the most common

Such as cleanliness and I’ve heard of defects where the foreskin is too tight and they have to circumcise it.

It’s definitely a cultural thing

And one that I’m for I’d definitely circumcise my kids

ofc in cases where its too tight, thats an exception

this is not about the issues of having it or not, which are slim due to modern hygene methods

this is an issue of cutting off somebody elses body part, which they might not've chosen on their own

99 percent of people didn’t chose to have it cut off. But the majority of those people don’t mind it

I’d a large amount of people really care for some reason then it’s an issue

those people dont know the mere orgasmic power having one has

It’s not the insanely different

I’ve looked into this

The orgasm is the same

It’s the sensitivity that’s different

i've talked to people without one that claim that having their penis touching their pants/underwear without issue

gl with that uncut

can be downright painful if it touches due to the sensitivity

What?

Don’t understand what you said

Re word it please

orgasm might be the same, a lot harder to get there, which might result in lasting longer sure

and all I said above was; the sensitivity is so intense that having the exposed part, usually covered by the foreskin, touch your pants, can be super uncomfortable

as an attempt to explain how different it feels, ei the sensitivity

That doesn’t sound good lol

well the point being it shouldnt be exposed

but we're still focusing on the right of deciding on other peoples atonomy

which is clearly wrong, dont you think?

Not when it’s the parents doing it

so you'd be fine with cutting off their arm too?

Obviously that’s a horrible analogy

no its not

Absolutely

you just said its the parents right to decide what their child keeps on their body

which extends even after they're 18+

https://youtu.be/UdRDt-Ug1jU