Message from @Delta

Discord ID: 749469433893748827


2020-08-30 03:17:43 UTC  

but I will take your word for it that they are sterotypically black

2020-08-30 03:17:45 UTC  

i have met

2020-08-30 03:17:53 UTC  

I think your failing to understand my point

2020-08-30 03:17:58 UTC  

They are. It’s been documented

2020-08-30 03:17:59 UTC  

Ditto

2020-08-30 03:18:06 UTC  

just because there are exceptions to the rule, doesn't mean there isn'

2020-08-30 03:18:09 UTC  

t a rule

2020-08-30 03:18:59 UTC  

That would be true if there wasn’t another potential rule with less exceptions: poverty

2020-08-30 03:19:36 UTC  

ok, but did you read what I wrote about that being hardly any better?

2020-08-30 03:21:19 UTC  

Yes

2020-08-30 03:21:31 UTC  

black people are more likely to be named tyrone. black people are more likely to be in poverty. the black people named tyrone are more likely to be in the ghetto. Now anyone named tyrone (disproportionately black people) gets judged for the name because it is associated with poverty because \as a large contributing factor black people are disproportionately in property.

2020-08-30 03:21:31 UTC  

If we have bias against the impoverished that’s bad

2020-08-30 03:21:45 UTC  

and black people are more likely to be impoverished

2020-08-30 03:21:59 UTC  

which effects stereotypically black names

2020-08-30 03:22:02 UTC  

And White people makes Clyde or more likely to be impoverished too

2020-08-30 03:22:13 UTC  

Does that mean discriminations against Clyde is racist?

2020-08-30 03:22:15 UTC  

which effects all black people

2020-08-30 03:22:34 UTC  

But people aren’t biased towards the impoverished because of there race but because of there social class

2020-08-30 03:23:03 UTC  

The fact there happens to be a racial correlation with poverty doesn’t mean the discrimination was due to race

2020-08-30 03:23:46 UTC  

how do you know that @T2the2ndpowr You know it is based 0% on race or that people aren't using race a shortcut to infer poverty? How do you know that?

2020-08-30 03:23:57 UTC  

I don’t

2020-08-30 03:24:04 UTC  

My point is neither does the study

2020-08-30 03:24:21 UTC  

The conclusion that it’s race based discrimination isn’t solid

2020-08-30 03:24:27 UTC  

@squid I could ask you the same question but change the words around a bit

2020-08-30 03:24:37 UTC  

no, you really cannot

2020-08-30 03:24:45 UTC  

I don't think you all are understanding my position

2020-08-30 03:24:47 UTC  

Also: that study does not even come close to demonstrating systemic racism

2020-08-30 03:24:52 UTC  

@T2the2ndpowr show him

2020-08-30 03:25:40 UTC  

the only way the results of the study do not imply some level of systemic racism, is if the results are explained 100% by something else. This is fact

2020-08-30 03:25:43 UTC  

When I get off work I will

2020-08-30 03:25:56 UTC  

Um

2020-08-30 03:25:57 UTC  

No

2020-08-30 03:26:04 UTC  

I believe the results of the study are indicative of some level of systemic racism

2020-08-30 03:26:09 UTC  

But I’m banging my head against a wall evidently

2020-08-30 03:26:15 UTC  

Not systemic racism

2020-08-30 03:26:19 UTC  

Unconscious bias maybe

2020-08-30 03:26:25 UTC  

But those are different

2020-08-30 03:26:31 UTC  

we are now squabbling about how much

2020-08-30 03:26:37 UTC  

and apparently defintions

2020-08-30 03:26:38 UTC  

And that’s even assuming I’d agree with the results of the study

2020-08-30 03:26:46 UTC  

Aight, I gotta go