Message from @ThePangburn

Discord ID: 753669054828380250


2020-09-10 17:08:14 UTC  

not that meaningful of a distinction imo bc its obviously speculative either way

2020-09-10 17:08:48 UTC  

I think would and might are very important distinctions

2020-09-10 17:08:52 UTC  

And I believe he said that

2020-09-10 17:08:58 UTC  

I’d agree with that

2020-09-10 17:09:27 UTC  

yeah i mean fair enough

2020-09-10 17:11:31 UTC  

Either way, it seems he was utterly misrepresented by that headline.

2020-09-10 17:11:53 UTC  

well we still dont have the actual quote

2020-09-10 17:12:13 UTC  

but yeah the headline is clickbait lol

2020-09-10 17:12:21 UTC  

for sure

2020-09-10 17:14:56 UTC  

Dawkins complained to The Times.

2020-09-10 17:15:56 UTC  

The quote isn't might or would, btw, its "may". FWIW.

2020-09-10 17:16:04 UTC  

😃

2020-09-10 17:28:03 UTC  

Maximize wellbeing for yourself and those around you. We can measure wellbeing. @everyone

2020-09-10 17:29:59 UTC  

How can we measure wellbeing

2020-09-10 17:30:33 UTC  

The scientific method.

2020-09-10 17:30:50 UTC  

That's not a valid answer

2020-09-10 17:30:50 UTC  

Lol

2020-09-10 17:31:07 UTC  

How do you measure wellbeing with the scientific method?

2020-09-10 17:31:11 UTC  

You could say that in response to a question about how we can measure anything...

2020-09-10 17:31:45 UTC  

You need to read the moral landscape. We can make a scientific, objective claim that chopping someone's head off is bad for their wellbeing.

2020-09-10 17:31:49 UTC  

Is in to ought

2020-09-10 17:32:15 UTC  

Then what about people who choose to commit suicide

2020-09-10 17:32:37 UTC  

That becomes their epitome of pleasure.

2020-09-10 17:32:43 UTC  

I deal with this in my new book.

2020-09-10 17:33:05 UTC  

what if someone has a distorted idea of what wellbeing is

2020-09-10 17:33:12 UTC  

Yeah what are the parameters of your measurement. Are we talking extraversion v nueroticism? Are we using other psychometric parameters. What tests are we using? T tests? ANOVA testing? Is it reliable in a test-restest setting?

2020-09-10 17:33:14 UTC  

then they shouldn't attempt to maximize wellbeing for themself or others

2020-09-10 17:33:23 UTC  

That's why we rely on the scientific method. No room for distortion.

2020-09-10 17:33:27 UTC  

It either is or isn't.

2020-09-10 17:33:29 UTC  

But you're making the claim that someone dying is bad for their wellbeing, yet people regularly decide for themselves that what's better is to not live

2020-09-10 17:34:02 UTC  

Whether or not someone * is * abiding by the scientific method doesn't mean they aren't going to feel like they are

2020-09-10 17:34:16 UTC  

No. Wellbeing is decided by the scientific method. You cannot be well if you are dead.

2020-09-10 17:34:25 UTC  

You can still decide against it.

2020-09-10 17:34:29 UTC  

and act on what they feel is the conclusion they arrived at via the scientific method

2020-09-10 17:34:37 UTC  

But it would be antithetical to your wellbeing.

2020-09-10 17:35:14 UTC  

It is not difficult to measure

2020-09-10 17:35:19 UTC  

If you decide that being is bad, then you're not well by being

2020-09-10 17:35:29 UTC  

And many people decide that

2020-09-10 17:35:42 UTC  

well..right. So what do we do? The worldview just says 'maximize wellbeing' and im an idiot and i tried to use the scientific method and the conclusion i arrived at was 'go around smacking people in the face'

2020-09-10 17:36:25 UTC  

Depression is a clinically diagnosed mental illness. So if you're endorsing a suicidal ideation, you're not really well by a psychological perspective.