@lockwood or they researched it and came to a different conclusion than you

> The age of consent at 18 is stupid anyway, should be somewhere from 21-25
@kaizen HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

right, and she was found criminally guilty of misconduct toward him

@lockwood stop spazzing

That's fucked

> @lockwood or they researched it and came to a different conclusion than you
@m.miller different not right one

I don’t agree with the law, but it’s not irrational

well...

@lockwood demonstrate how you have the correct conclusion

Oh no

of course it is. For an act that was committed as a violation of his consent at age 12, he will go to prison if he does not pay for child support

It will be demonstrated when you die no worries.

We’re gonna go down the rabbit hole of him trying to justify god

Yeah so they say lockwood

@lockwood nah that doesn't work.

doesn't work?

"I'm right til you're dead and find out nothing cause you're dead"

"so just deal with it"

You need to demonstrate your claim, not just cop out.

your claim is that you dont know

“The court stated that the state's interest in ensuring that a minor receives child support outweighed its interest in potentially deterring sexual crimes against minors.” Not a bad argument @BobbyMack

You're the one making the truth claim so you have the burdennof proof.

you kinda cop out

there

> You're the one making the truth claim so you have the burdennof proof.
@m.miller I dont if my truth will be shown regardless

Demonstrate that it will be shown

Feel in yourself how carefree you can be about that statement. Imagine for a moment the consequences of an adult male raping a 12 year old girl and having her go to prison for it, whether indirectly or not

There’s like 2 debates going on at once right now lol

yeah it's getting iffy

It’s not rape if it was consensual regardless of age imo

> There’s like 2 debates going on at once right now lol
@T2the2ndpowr

Laws like that in that situation are biased against men from what I’ve seen

Double standards

Under criminal law sure, under civil maybe not

that's an EXTREMELY controversial claim

"consent regardless of age" is an extremely controversial claim

I made an important distinction tho in my follow up

@Zurich04 id argue it is in both because the child doesn’t have the ability to make a decision like that

Also underaged sex is illegal, so if 2 minors were caught do they both get prosecuted

theoretically yes but in reality no

Under criminal law it should be considered rape perhaps. I’m just trying to rationalize on the spot so bare with me