Message from @Jayde
Discord ID: 580881305919815751
In fact I have only referred to fact finding missions.
If you ever want to do what we call a deep dive, send me a message. I'll go wherever the facts lead.
A scientist's reputation and credibility is based on the credibility of their work. If they put out a study that uses poor methods, some other scientist will point it out and the study would be discredited. The scientist who pointed out the poor methods would be highly respected.
Do not forget that first they called it global cooling then global warming and then since they were wrong on both they called it climate change that way no matter what the climate did they were right! .................But no they are wrong!
<:PepeYay:539084299391991828>
<:PepeInterdasting:539084299727536128>
<:BluePepesMatter:539084293545394176>
Science never claims to have the final word on something. It never claims anything is 100% proven. It is always open to being proven wrong.
You have a point @tunacanman but the science world is vicious. I saw it first hand. What happens when a scientist goes in opposition to this climate theory?......legitimacy matters not. Because lets say said scientist is working for *enter any higher education institution name here* .......and that institution donates a ton of money to whatever candidate.......Do you think they're going to publish a report ....or even support a report that goes against the platform of that candidate?
Because its a scratch my back ill scratch yours world.
☝
And state schools ....University of Texas....University of North Carolina.....all of them.....are donating to candidates
☝
Not just Ivy Leagues
All of them.
Every last one is in cahoots with some politician or another
☝
I go by the ABC Rule.
Any body but Carolina
and I have a whining dog that needs to pee
GO PACK
😂
GO DUKE
NCSU ALUMNI
lol
Ill be back shortly
Blue Ridge Parkway in NC...ftw. It's all I got for the moment.
I try to go down the parkway in the fall when the leaves change
If a scientist makes a discovery that goes against the current consensus, and that research can be replicated by other scientists, then that scientist RECIEVES A NOBEL PRIZE.
BS she is getting the hell out before SHTF
May will go Friday
Watch the video attached to the tweet. PARODY ADVERT lol
If a university suppressed research it would be a big controversy. It wouldn't go unnoticed.
The scientists who did the research would be like "Wtf, they suppressed our research." and they would report it to the world and their fellow scientists
1922 committee will meet Friday morn 10am 11:30/12:00 may will exit No 10 short speech go back into No 10 leave thru back door.