Message from @Sailor
Discord ID: 461547290205618177
@V77 good point I see the value for others. I was just being purist
CNN Falls To Food Network In Last Week’s Ratingshttp://dailycaller.com/2018/06/26/cnn-food-network-ratings/
Trump-Putin summit: US and Russia agree to hold meeting in 'third country' | The Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/us-russia-summit-trump-putin-meeting-kremlin-where-john-bolton-yuri-ushakov-a8419661.html?amp&utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter&__twitter_impression=true
In my opinion any compromise of the Liberties our Constitution guarantees is not worth the cost. If the legal interventions into personal choices were removed, like the documentary Kat mentioned, the problem resolves itself.
@Pawhuska As is your Right! You was use generally here. I try to be a humble grasshopper. 🤣
😂
Federal Judge Orders Immigrant Family Reunification Within 30 days — Ends Family Separationhttp://dailycaller.com/2018/06/27/california-judge-rapid-reunification/
We upheld a similar law in Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Ed., 431 U. S. 209 (1977), and we recognize the importance of following precedent unless there are strong reasons for not doing so. But there are very strong reasons in this case. Fundamental free speech rights are at stake. Abood was poorly reasoned. It has led to practical problems and abuse. It is inconsistent with other First Amendment cases and has been undermined by more recent decisions. Developments since Abood was handed down have shed new light on the issue of agency fees, and no reliance interests on the part of public-sector unions are sufficient to justify the perpetuation of the free speech violations
He has that Franciscan monk look
Kegan & Sotomayor with a purely emotional dissent..
This leftist PC Bullshit has gone too damn far!! http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/06/27/do-have-to-erase-name-laura-ingalls-wilder-to-fix-history-and-who-will-be-next.html
Rarely if ever has the Court overruled a decision—let alone one of this import—with so little regard for the usual principles of stare decisis. There are no special justifications for reversing Abood. It has proved workable. No recent developments have eroded its underpinnings. And it is deeply entrenched, in both the law and the real world. More than 20 States have statutory schemes built on the decision. Those laws underpin thousands of ongoing contracts involving millions of employees. Reliance interests do not come any stronger than those surrounding Abood. And likewise, judicial disruption does not get any greater than what the Court does today. I respectfully dissent. I
We get caught up in our mind. Our thoughts become our identity. The thinker takes over. We get stuck in our head. We are far more than this. 🌞💫 💛
Dirty: Comey Had Team of ‘Cleaners’ To Deal with Agents Who Wouldn’t Play Ball on Clinton Probe – True PunditTrue Pundit
https://truepundit.com/dirty-comey-had-team-of-cleaners-to-deal-with-agents-who-wouldnt-play-ball-on-clinton-probe/
A good election recap. A Big Upset, Trump’s Endorsement And More From The June 26 Primaries | FiveThirtyEight
https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/june-26-election-results/
👆
You have gained a rank @mrsarboe, you just advanced to 3 . Thanks for all you do Patriot!
@Holly Engel hello 😃 How’s the kitchen going?
I’m off with the fairies
🤣
Soon. I still have pneumonia
😑