Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 471518527929450507
You're all welcome
come again
This was fun to listen to while I played games.
Same lol
aww sounds like I missed something hot af
"The short answer to this question is that our personalities have a genetic component. "
https://study.com/academy/lesson/is-personality-genetic-dnas-influence-on-temperament.html
Not only IQ
But temperament.
The science is robust on these issues
Hereditary.
He is pretending it's grey. It's not.
<:thanosdaddy:459545656479055873>
Intersectional Feminism is riddled with the exact same type of statitistical studies that reportantly validate their assertion the gender is a social construct.
Show me
If I take a sample of 100 people living in Europe for a study to find out if exposure to power lines over the long duration causes cancer and I fail to account for the fact that Europeans tend to smoke over 60% more than AMericans, my conclusion showing a high correlation of power line exposure to cases of cancer will be flawed.
Link?
The reason is that both smoking and power line exposure will show a positive correlation, thus my test variable was not controlled properly in my randomization.
I find ...... one sec
That's the tired "cultures aren't accounted for" argument. They already fixed that.
I feel like ur arguments are from 1990
Lol
That's a lesson
Combinational variance of statistics:
One of the longest, and at times most contentious, debates inWestern intellectual
history concerns the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors
on human behavioral differences, the so-called nature-nurture debate (Degler
There are many in the soft-sciences that have misapplied statistical technicques which have given rise to very popular and well beleived theories and fields of study. One such example is the multiple worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. But this is an occupational hazard of academics.
Statistics used in such a way only points towards the possibility which is useful and worth examination.
It's so genetic soon it will be a spit test to determine iq....
You're just wrong.
Your constant guessing at potential biases are non-existent in reality regarding general intelligence.
But not evidence.
Indirectly linked to intelligences
You're imagining problems that don't exist.
Lol
No.
Scientists only know about genes; not behaviour
Incorrect
Is behavior magical? It's easy to test.... An IQ test.
No scientist that studies genetics also has the same depth of education in behavioural sciences.
Lol