Message from @skreee
Discord ID: 471885330241421323
no but it will realign what groups exist in very radical ways
Plus, as it's been gone over again and again, much as women choose their own race, white women especially, people will not choose OTHER races for their children.
I'm surprised you don't know that
I am aware of that
although
I do think it's very likely many people from every race if given the choice would begin to adopt aesthetic attributes that are not necessarily those of their own race
given the amount of plastic surgery already done
Yes every one will be white....which is fine with me. 🤣
particularly among indians, asians, and jews
regardless what's actually important in terms of behavior isn't how people look, it's what genetics they have which effect intelligence and other traits
They LL choose the best of their own.
That's what I'm saying
Race isn't going away
It won't "go away" but there definitely will be new races created
I think it's ludicrous to think that after genetic modification becomes standard that those that opt-out would be considered racial kin to those who leveraged it to move forward
No reason to assume that
sure there is- the first and foremost basis of race is genetic kinship
after that it's just muh feels we wuz romans bullshit
Like I said....like mating and choices of sperm banks now ....race matters greatly, one of the core requirements
BRB
yes, however ethnicity historically has been far more powerful a social bond than race- it's the reason tribe was divided against tribe during each and every colonial conquest, and why the greatest wars in history have been fought between ethnic states and not race against race. Pan-European or ‘white’ nationalism is primarily an American phenomena.
what temperament is "best" to select? should your kid be beefy as fuck should longevity be prioritized? these are choices that will have to be made and will likely come down along internal cultural/political lines, and the results of these choices will be the creation of new ethnic divides that are more divided in genetic content than ever before, and in a deliberate way that no-one except the most deluded can deny.
One of the first and foremost reasons America stopped being an explicitly racist country was because enough of the population was convinced that racial differences were the product of corrupted pseudo-science. Once genetic differences are explicitly engineered into existence this fiction will become indefensible and collapse.
And if in every way except the features of your face and color of skin you have the same temperament and way of thinking as a whole cohort of persons who were genetically engineered to be in a particular way- I find it hard to believe that these won't be the predominant blocks upon which identity is formed, rather than a 'race' being fragmented in every direction.
Ethnicity and race are not separable, historically. Pan-europeanism has many European based thinkers in origin. Though, it has been more successful in the USA, for obvious reasons. It's not really pan european in origin, it was just Anglo Saxon at its origin and for much of it's first establishment years.
USA discovered the european can assimilate.
USA also discovered the difficulty and fact that racial groups segregate. So I'm not really sure why you think it matters where the "phenomenon" originates... The EU today and NATO and other treaties show there is cooperation across European ethnicities.
Also, no one is arguing dissolving Europe's ethnicities on the far right. So your point here is misguided.
The political selection, as I said, is my racial group. I'm not sure your "best temperament to select" question even makes sense. What are you talking about?
Your history of America is irrelevant, but also wrong. It's still racist, and race still matters. It became not legally racist because of social movements that had nothing to do with "reversing pseudo science", WTF are you talking about? It was a pro-black movement that established blacks as a protected class... You think that is "defending science" you're nuts.
Your genetic choice argument I already addressed. People still choose their own race. Regardless of technology or outcome. People choose the own race to ASSOCIATE with regardless of other factors of genes because that is the most cohesive and high trust option people naturally choose.
You think people naturally segregate today based on a poll of their races iq and temperament? No! They self segregate based on race then ethnicity, then social class....
If they're rich enough, they go live in the all white neighborhood, Because that's the best area to live. <--- read that 10 times slowly.
All white areas could be codified. And that's the future white men should want.
And it's the future they do want. Their behavioral patterns prove it without a shadow of a doubt.
White people prefer whites, and when they are allowed to be in all white territories by every measure it's preferable.
Recognize reality.
Look at every 90+ % area that is European today, that's the type of civilization we should strive for. The people make the society, and white people make really great societies.
Think of your Children, think of the future: Choose White
And you fail to recognize is our competitors are fully aware of this. And, attack us accordingly. It's not just an academic argument, there's a real (geo)political battle going on.
Its time to circle the wagons
and the European territory and people of European descent make perfect sense
<:Redpill:459545654272720896>
<:youtube:335112740957978625> **Searching** 🔎 `https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoo3iECPTRU`
❌ **Failed to load** `This video contains content from SME, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.`
Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit)- The Dispossession of Europeans & Pathological Altruism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4goBcZY2Eo
Barbara Spectre has no power
I don't know how many times I need to point that out
Who told you that?
@Deleted User
“Ethnicity and race are not separable, historically. Pan-europeanism has many European based thinkers in origin. Though, it has been more successful in the USA, for obvious reasons. It's not really pan european in origin, it was just Anglo Saxon at its origin and for much of it's first establishment years.”
It certainly is separable when you see racial pan-europeanism acting out on the world stage as entirely powerless when compared to the power of ethnic boundaries and ethnic states over the court of history.
“USA discovered the european can assimilate.
USA also discovered the difficulty and fact that racial groups segregate. So I'm not really sure why you think it matters where the "phenomenon" originates... The EU today and NATO and other treaties show there is cooperation across European ethnicities. “
The origin of it is irrelevant, I am talking about the actual power the idea has played in the course of world history. The EU and NATO are quite poor examples to pick for pan-european racialism as they’re actively undermining the solvency of European races and actively persecute racialist movements.
“Also, no one is arguing dissolving Europe's ethnicities on the far right. So your point here is misguided.”
I never argued they were.
“The political selection, as I said, is my racial group. I'm not sure your "best temperament to select" question even makes sense. What are you talking about? “
The actual substance of what binds peoples together other than the arbitrary idea of a racial/ethnic group to rally around is their distinctive nature. Genetic modification would make this nature radically fungible.