do you know how numbers work

Yes I do

>different aspects

that's heresy to a proper christian

It has been written and theorized.

A proper Christian?

st. athanasius did not write the athanasian creed just to be dabbed on 1700 years later

And yet he was

The trinity is the way it is

if it is real, st. athanasius' view is the only valid one

So says the church of St. PETER

Three aspects of one god, manifest pieces of the lord that are actually one. How he has chosen to present himself to us through the Father, Son and Holy Spirit

the church of St. Peter is the only proper church

others do not respect the Torah

they create whackadoo bible societies

As I said, the Torah tells of a saviour

And that is what the church of St. PETER says

that saviour would be rejected by the people.

@NullJager but nowhere does it state the moshiach being G-d

you're speaking of Isaiah with the rejection thing iirc

Isaiah 44 or some such

That refers to Israel, Jacob, not the Nazarene

Oof, he brings out the misread theory

that is the traditional interpretation

unless you are specifically looking for a proof of the Nazarene you will not find it in Isaiah

Brother, my respect for God's chosen ends here

Well, there have been a good few who have postulated that it did not refer to Jacob and Israel.

And they were not just on the Christian side of the fence.

such as?

@NullJager are you Catholic?

no, otherwise he would not posit that the Trinity is aspects of G-d @Alex D_rizzle

That is not Catholic teaching

No at the moment I'm non-denom.

it is not professed in the athanasian creed

Christened CoE.

The Roman Catholic church does teach the Trinity

correct, but not in the sense that NullJager professes

the idea of the persons of the trinity being aspects was condemned

@Deleted User in the name of the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit

And I'm just using the words that came to mind at the time.

They are taught as three consubstantial persons.