In 1971 I believe

no, just because new documents came out doesn't mean old ones are invalidated

the main thing was Nostra Aetate 4

that doesn't rule out anything

It does excuse the Jewish people

At least partially

it just states that Catholics, despite the rocky history, are to respect Jews and that there is a spiritual link between the new and old covenant

not necessarily

let me re-read nostra aetate 4 one sec

also vatican ii happened in the early 60s, by the 70s Pope Paul VI was doing liturgical changes

Didn't the rewrite finally happen in the 1971

well what do you mean by rewrite? the novus ordo?

or the translations? or the documents?

Okay shit your correct

1965

It only semi-exonerated your people for collective responsibility

Protestants still support Zionism though and have for quite some time.

Such is the unification of the Jewish-WASP financial elite

I don't support Zionism, I think it is good though that we have a state of Israel

I don't support it in the sense that I am not active in the movement

A burgeoning ethno-state*

Where Arabs are a simple demographic issue

I find that many Zionists are secular and that's what turns me off

The tolerance of this sublte ethno-state is quite something.

It has many good places for the orthodox, but bombing hotels is unjustifiable

Jews are cancer

Judaism is cancer

Oof

rude

It is the foundation of all abrahamic faiths

>he doesn't know about hermes

It's a cancerous race of people too

Of course the abrahamic faiths amalgamated the mythos of the crescent

I know my history you fuck

Mfw defend the Jew and he strikes back at me

Kek

See?

>mythos of the crescent

what are you talking about

I will not fall to anti-Semitism though