Message from @Josh42A
Discord ID: 461913385190031360
I understand that in reality people can be in a gray area
but in practice we can not allow that
Like Gaddafi.
you can not be supportive of us and our greatest enemy
Gaddafi unironically was based and was victimized because he identified as a socialist even though in reality he was third position and anti-USSR.
If they wish to be neutral let them be neutral but siding with the USSR is not neutrality
Gaddafi=woke change my mind
I believe that the middle east needs dictators for the time being honsetly
the opposite position isnt true though I dont support US or their enemies
That is true neutrality
So they can be controlled and guided to democracy? Yes. That is the foreign policy lie used during the Cold War.
and that is fine
Guess how rich and functional and not corrupt South American democracies are?
👎
they are largely socialistic
and Chile is doing quite well comparatively
Oh comparatively.
Venezuela is a socialist utopia
compared to the rest of South America yes
I don't think anyone takes Venezuela seriously, not even before Chavez died.
He just squandered oil revenue on social programs. Any sensible economist knows you have to diversify.
And oil is a volatile market good.
So it was just a matter of time. He was a fucking moron.
they made an oil backed crypto currency then exit scammed it
none of us serious investers bought in it was only the idiots that bet on everything
Socialism gone wrong (NSFW) (NOT CLICKBAIT)
>implying it can go right
Can't go right when you have a populist clown like Chavez in charge.
@εïз irma εïз the American press took Venezuela very seriously when Chavez was around.
Who takes the American press seriously?
That is a good point.
But they did have a Chavez boner
Well liberals are just as eager to hop onto something without knowing anything about it as confirmation of their beliefs as the right is.
So, Communists are anti imperialists and, but materialistic as well. So, if they reject any sort of religion in favor of even more materialism, would that lead to the conquering of land for resources?
Isn't that imperialism then?
🤔
@everyone 🔖 Daily Question
What are the pros and cons of full drug legalization in your opinion?
pros: less crime and violence. cons: it is a step to a society more accepting of extremely unhealthy practices
let's not make this a slippery slope thing it directly leads to a society more accepting of extremely unhealthy practices
The slippery slope exists
it's literally a fallacy