Yes, it is becoming too polarized. How does it end? One side wins. The side that wants it the most. The side that’s willing to sacrifice. The side that’s willing to spend the most blood and treasure. That’s how this ends.

^^^^^^^^^^^

What if you end up sacrificing the very things you committed to fight for?

Then the victory is phrric, but losing is always losing. Don’t sacrifice the things that matter most. Just the things that matter enough to hurt. @chaotic hot chocolate

@everyone 🔖 Daily Question
Does the United States have a right or an obligation to ensure worldwide stability as the world's sole superpower? Does any power have the right to? ex. Britain during the Victorian Era?

No

I don't think it has a right

Whether or not it has an obligation is the real question

Rights don't exist

^

You by yourself deserve nothing

Noone owes you something

You gotta earn it

they owe you not killing you

I'd say the US has a reason to interfiere in Countries that want to start war with them

Well there's the rights guaranteed by the amendments

Which is again the case with any country

There's also basic human rights

Those don't exist

*But those countries may not see them as basic human rights*

thats not true

Legal rights at least are enforced normally

Inherent human rights don't exist in any sense

with out a right to life society doesnt exist

^

WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY

Only power is real, everything else is cope

*But what gives you the right to decide wether they have an actual society*

WE LIVE

IN A SOCIETY

WE DO

They might see it as something different

>Only power is real, everything else is cope
literal retardation

^

We have different morals

their wrong

objectively

Obligation? Absolutely not. Right? The right to dominate the world is granted by power. Anyone who can do it has the right in that sense.

where's the lie though