but you lose the riots

and conflict

@SolidGold

yea. I prefer the National Socialism model. Think it would do even better.

I don't think so

Requires extensive welfare state, Puts you at conflict with the entire world

etc

@SolidGold

The "welfare" state is part of the package. I don't think you have to be at war. Don't have to.

But I'd also rather not capitulate to the bankers either.

if that means war with "the world" then so be it

I'd rather "the world" join us in resisting the bankers.

Welfare redistribution never works

socialism is evil

and the world is needed because you need to spread your people

lebensraum

Purity Spiral

It's why national Socialist ethno nationalism isn't viable

This is General Plan Ost I

try get the true aryans and try excluding people with any traceable non aryan lineage and you end up cutting out so many people the movement falls apart

They didn't need "the world" tho. That was just the part East of them.

They wanted the world eventually

the movement was fine with it's purity regulations. It was existing fine. That's not at all what defeated it and also helped it.

Dividing Europeans against europeans will cause the end of our civilization

caring about race will end civilization

"die or end" ^

seems like the Europeans all hooked up in the EU is what has caused the end of their civilization

Are you european @SolidGold

Lol

Europe lol

I said I'm American. European blood.

interesting

also what makes someone jewish?

1/2

1/4

1/8?

nationalism is what keeps them existing. Giving it up deracinates them.

Ashkenazi Jews are european

genetic evidence proves

that

if you want to have a real debate, then ask him why he likes national socialism and let him hang himself