the injuns slaughtered europeans too

it wasn't a friendly day for anyone

They refused to own the land and they went into areas they didn't even live in to attack Europeans

they literally refused to own land

it's not their's

you're just repeating themself

the fact that they refused to own land knocks your argument down

It's literally in any anthropological study of them

they even say it

such as Tecumseh

Tecumseh spoke to William Henry Harrison

And the fact that the natives were nomadic means they didnt own land

it's a checkmate

last I check if you owned land you don't move around and leave it behind

ok so you're going to strawman

They regularly led incursions into other tribe's territory to set up their own lands

for squatting

Your argument is that Europeans stole native american land and their identity

Native Americans all the way to South America still keep their culture in and out of reservation zones

they culturually didn't believe in land ownership

The proof is in the priori

they were nomadic and had nomadic living arrangements

therefore they didn't hold land as ownership

they used it as a communal resource

otherwise there is no point is evilly migrating and leading incursions and slaughtering other fellow native americans that we seem to forget here

yeah

and when they tried it then it failed

they played by the sword and lost

they refused ownership in general if they were nomadic

they acted like dogs

they marked an area they used for resources then left

meaning they didn't own the land

so when big evil colonial powers come in and take land they left behind they started fighting

and indians get kicked around like a soccer ball

I just said that they owned it as communal resource

communal =/= communist

communist = communal

keep that in mind

communist is a fleshed out ideology that includes communal living

nope public implies an advanced defined structure of ownership

they used resources then moved on