that means they need a society built by other peoples to make them work

We just want it because we know it'll limit the gov

we don't expect a full deconstruction

@Deleted User You're a minarchist

welcome

Yeah probably

I have never had an issue with singapore

You see a lot of Libertarians becoming NatSocs

you can have a dictator that doesn't overreach

Why do an-caps worship pinochet and assad

oof

I think dictatorships are more suited for capitalism anyways

Republics always slowly descend and stay anti-capitalist for a long time

dictatorships you can hold someone accountable, and kill them

Anarchism is left wing. Nationalism is right wing. They are fundamentally opposed to one another. The fact that Republicans claim to be pro small-government is an intellectual inconsistency... It's an opportunistic one since mostly Republicans own guns and in case of emergency, they know they'll fight for the Republicans should civil war break out.

republics create an illusion of choice and representation that tricks the masses into not rebelling

@Da_Fish
He already answered you though

@Big Ooooof... anarcho-capitalism is not anti-nationalism

It is!

or at least, the ones that don't want to destroy borders

It is anarcho, which makes it completely opposed to the idea of nations...

nation = people

I think I got ligma

ligmanuts

^

exactly! Anarcho-capitalists are individualists though!

Capitalist countries often were white nationalist

like for instance hitler's germany

was not white nationalist

it was german nationalist

Yes it was-

he was less pro-white than the USA at the time

lol

kills slavs

white nationalist

ah

@Big Ooooof... Whats your ideology

I have my own Ideology.

oooooooooooooooooooooooooof

@Big Ooooof...
Do you really think they will let the outgroup just walk in their now privately owned areas

oof