Message from @Froce

Discord ID: 473879080647917585


2018-07-30 22:42:17 UTC  

I don’t buy horse shoe theory. It’s usually comparing communism and fascism. They are both very restrictive, but fascists understand that human nature is a thing, and a big part of that is hierarchy, and they seek to build a hierarchy that efficiently maximizes human potential based on our nature.Communist on the other hand deny human nature and seek to rebuild humans to fit a fictional, idealistic, and ultimately impossible, utopian fantasy. Fascist may be wrong. Maybe. But they’re not nearly as wrong as communist.

2018-07-30 23:33:34 UTC  

Hmmmm

2018-07-30 23:55:17 UTC  

Saved

2018-07-30 23:55:26 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/452955238186614794/473639791762735114/Importance_of_Racial_Identity_by_Race_2016_USA.png

2018-07-30 23:55:52 UTC  

I post this to reinforce my earlier point

2018-07-30 23:55:56 UTC  

@iwantfun post that in <#452955256960057385> for future use

2018-07-30 23:56:58 UTC  

About individualism, family(ism?), and tribalism

2018-07-30 23:57:52 UTC  

With the west being he center point for individual

2018-07-30 23:58:10 UTC  

The east (asia) for family

2018-07-30 23:58:20 UTC  

And africa for tribalism

2018-07-30 23:59:00 UTC  

we used to be more on the family side for sure
But not more than asia

2018-07-31 15:45:10 UTC  

@everyone 🔖 Daily Question

"Which is more important to you? Ensuring the rights of the individual or pursuing the interests of the collective?"

2018-07-31 15:45:15 UTC  

2018-07-31 15:45:43 UTC  

Individual

2018-07-31 15:45:55 UTC  

collective

2018-07-31 15:46:03 UTC  

Collective

2018-07-31 15:46:03 UTC  

Individual

2018-07-31 15:46:06 UTC  

collective

2018-07-31 15:46:06 UTC  

pursuing the interests of the collective seems to outweigh

2018-07-31 15:46:16 UTC  

but individual rights can act as a prerequisite to taht

2018-07-31 15:46:17 UTC  

Individual

2018-07-31 15:46:35 UTC  

Collective

2018-07-31 15:47:24 UTC  

It depends but more collective

2018-07-31 15:50:26 UTC  

I think collectivizing is necessary

2018-07-31 15:51:08 UTC  

It's not

2018-07-31 15:51:23 UTC  

Individualists are collectivists in their own right, one could argue

2018-07-31 15:51:31 UTC  

Collectivist in thought

2018-07-31 15:51:36 UTC  

Just not in ethnicity

2018-07-31 15:52:28 UTC  

You do not represent all of the millions of other whites for example, nor do they represent you

2018-07-31 15:52:52 UTC  

huwhite powah

2018-07-31 15:52:52 UTC  

Define 'represent,' because I don't claim that I do

2018-07-31 15:56:45 UTC  

Collective

2018-07-31 15:59:09 UTC  

individualist

2018-07-31 16:01:56 UTC  

@anonymous anonymous Depends on what, exactly?

2018-07-31 16:06:34 UTC  

if he can get some ebony

2018-07-31 16:07:18 UTC  

@Deleted User Well individual rights are a nice ideal but can be damaging, like a drug attic can say its my right to do that drug. Yes it is but that can affect other people there for it should be illegal. Because the damage ought weights the freedom.

2018-07-31 16:09:44 UTC  

But you could say the same about guns. But the right to defend ones self out weights the damage firearms make.

2018-07-31 17:08:17 UTC  

Individuals

2018-07-31 17:08:24 UTC  

Free speech

2018-07-31 17:08:28 UTC  

Wooh

2018-07-31 17:22:09 UTC  

whats that thing in your avi