Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 481551507972554752
When the liberty of the people is at stake
That's one way to put it
When the führer is dead
Wait
What do you consider to be a threat to the people?
Gee idk
A foreign country invasion?
If it’s an immediate emergency with a high cost to life, I’m ok with corners being cut, but not without consequences, or without emendate transparency.
The death of the führer is a threat to the people
Personal liberty>national security
War would definitely count.
Calvin
You won't have the personal liberty if an invading country takes over
Calvin the communist
Temporary breaks if liberty in order to save the nation are at times necessary
In*
Under the vast majority of events personal liberty should trump security, but under the threat of destruction from an invasion? Survival will be paramount. The trenches is hardly a place for Democracy .
Donald Trump
No u
Lol
Personal liberty should only be violated if there is a good reason to, not because the governments just claims it will make people safer.
Personal liberty should not exist
Because thats how it works in the EU
@Obungus definitely. I expect a damn good reason when it happens.
And for it to be an infrequent event.
The EU is gay
National security above all means
Having power feels so good
depends on the situation but it's best to err on the side of personal liberty
Ideally, the people are the nation. National security is directed and controlled by the people.
@everyone Daily Question 🔖
How should private companies that wrongfully censor political opponents be punished? Should they even be punished at all? When is corporate censorship okay, and is it something legislation can address?
homo
Private companies should be allowed t do as they please as long as they do not falsely advertise that they are unbiased
What’s to stop them from advertising they are unbiased but having a bias anyways?
Government fines
And how would one report this to the government and what essentially decides if a company has a bias or not.
Twitter now has huge biases against the right but none against anti-white racists.