Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 482256047810150402


2018-08-23 18:29:36 UTC  

E

2018-08-23 18:29:44 UTC  

Different countries

2018-08-23 18:29:46 UTC  

Swiss just rejected it

2018-08-23 18:29:48 UTC  

We could try it here

2018-08-23 18:29:49 UTC  

It worked well in Canada and Finland in homogenous towns

2018-08-23 18:29:54 UTC  

No

2018-08-23 18:30:01 UTC  

It didn’t show long term effects

2018-08-23 18:31:02 UTC  

This is what we should all strive for, if you arent for this you arent a real american

2018-08-23 18:31:28 UTC  

A movie is what we should base our society on!!!!

2018-08-23 18:31:30 UTC  

<:tipp:362030204673196033>

2018-08-23 18:31:38 UTC  

That’s like totally realistic!!

2018-08-23 18:31:41 UTC  

UBI also doesn't encourage people to stay poor in the same manner as welfare but it does open up the can of worms of refusing to be employed and living in a barrel

2018-08-23 18:31:53 UTC  

Watch the damn video

2018-08-23 18:31:58 UTC  

I am

2018-08-23 18:31:59 UTC  

I’m serious

2018-08-23 18:32:22 UTC  

What do I do when I see a video that says the exact opposite?

2018-08-23 18:32:30 UTC  

watch it

2018-08-23 18:32:59 UTC  

It wouldn't be 10k a year, maybe 5k

2018-08-23 18:33:06 UTC  

I don't think UBI is a good choice in the USA

2018-08-23 18:33:21 UTC  

or anywhere with an immigration policy that's lenient to any degree

2018-08-23 18:33:25 UTC  

Yea, Americans are too lazy & would take advantage of it

2018-08-23 18:33:31 UTC  

In Japan or Taiwan it would work ok

2018-08-23 18:33:36 UTC  

Because they already have generational restrictions

2018-08-23 18:33:43 UTC  

For instance if you're a 1st gen immigrant, you can't vote, or get welfare

2018-08-23 18:33:45 UTC  

@Froce it would still cost 1.25 trillion a year

2018-08-23 18:33:53 UTC  

1.25 trillion is less than social security

2018-08-23 18:33:56 UTC  

and welfare

2018-08-23 18:33:59 UTC  

Yeah

2018-08-23 18:34:05 UTC  

But all those programs are bad

2018-08-23 18:34:07 UTC  

I agree

2018-08-23 18:34:13 UTC  

As well as UBI

2018-08-23 18:34:16 UTC  

How

2018-08-23 18:34:21 UTC  

They are necessary

2018-08-23 18:34:28 UTC  

Whats a good jewlution?

2018-08-23 18:34:32 UTC  

*solution

2018-08-23 18:34:35 UTC  

UBI of 10,000$ per year (still below poverty line) would cost 2.6 trillion $ per year. Meaning that confiscating __all__ the wealth of those worth over 1 million dollars would find the program for 5 months. Meaning that after a very small threshold, you would only be getting your money back or losing it. It would cause the rich to not be able to create jobs for the poor and consumer products for the middle class. In addition, it would be extremely dangerous during an election period as a candidate could just run and promise to make it higher to get more votes.

2018-08-23 18:34:43 UTC  

@Kosaki is obviously a troll

2018-08-23 18:34:47 UTC  

My main fear is that UBI would basically go into effect, the stupid poor would waste it all, and cry for another rent/food subsidy scheme, and then we're stuck with an even more expensive system.

2018-08-23 18:34:50 UTC  

I am not, I love post irony

2018-08-23 18:35:18 UTC  

Which I think is very likely in the USA/UK/Germany (soon)