1. the government to both

2. cause everyone survives, maybe it's not totally fair but idc

3. there will be compensation

4. idk that's debatable

4 isnt really a debate. it will decrease the yields. There is a huge body of evidence for this from all the countries that have tried it. Second of all, food is extremely cheap in america under capitalism. You can buy 50 lbs of rice for like 20 bucks. Anyone working at mcdonalds can make that much money in an afternoon and eat rice for months

so whats the problem?

who decides "what a person needs to live"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_League_(United_States)

what if i want a jacuzzi?

gay nazis

what if i want a dog?

vs communist jews

who wins

what if i want a mansion? can the government give me one, please?

also blamed aids on communists and jews

a diet of rice isn't humane

you don't need a fucking mansion to live

its a staple food in most of the world

you need a bed and a roof

you can't just eat rice

and you missed the point if you have months worth of rice for a few hours of work, you can easily add in other meats and so on along with it without much trouble at all

that causes severe and debilitating malnutrition

but again, realize that in your system the person who decides "what a person needs to live" has essentially total power over the country

how does this get established?

not one person

what if they decide we dont need cancer treatments

and don't use slippery slope

what if they decide it makes sense to cut off life support whenever someone falls unconscious

what slippery slope?

history teaches us that slippery slope is not a fallacy

"yeah but if gays get to marry its not like transexuality or pedophilia is going to be the next quest"

said some guy 10 years ago

10 years? They said that 5 years ago

transexuality is legitimate tho

Hahaha

not gonna support pedophilia but that won't get legalized

transexuality is illegetimate

they are anti science

show me your science

men have dicks girls have vagina