Message from @The American Nationalist
Discord ID: 484161152222363658
but not complete equality of outcome
who gives? who has the authority to seize the harvest of a farmer?
why is that fair?
who is going to work the fields without compensation?
is that likely to lead to bigger yields, or less?
1. the government to both
2. cause everyone survives, maybe it's not totally fair but idc
3. there will be compensation
4. idk that's debatable
4 isnt really a debate. it will decrease the yields. There is a huge body of evidence for this from all the countries that have tried it. Second of all, food is extremely cheap in america under capitalism. You can buy 50 lbs of rice for like 20 bucks. Anyone working at mcdonalds can make that much money in an afternoon and eat rice for months
so whats the problem?
who decides "what a person needs to live"
what if i want a jacuzzi?
gay nazis
what if i want a dog?
vs communist jews
who wins
what if i want a mansion? can the government give me one, please?
a diet of rice isn't humane
you don't need a fucking mansion to live
its a staple food in most of the world
you need a bed and a roof
you can't just eat rice
and you missed the point if you have months worth of rice for a few hours of work, you can easily add in other meats and so on along with it without much trouble at all
that causes severe and debilitating malnutrition
but again, realize that in your system the person who decides "what a person needs to live" has essentially total power over the country
how does this get established?
not one person
what if they decide we dont need cancer treatments
and don't use slippery slope
what if they decide it makes sense to cut off life support whenever someone falls unconscious
what slippery slope?
history teaches us that slippery slope is not a fallacy
"yeah but if gays get to marry its not like transexuality or pedophilia is going to be the next quest"
said some guy 10 years ago
10 years? They said that 5 years ago
transexuality is legitimate tho
Hahaha