Message from @Alice Redacted

Discord ID: 485262239641894912


2018-09-01 01:36:04 UTC  

They can do that griselda

2018-09-01 01:36:11 UTC  

that's a form of protection

2018-09-01 01:36:16 UTC  

I feel like I don't understand the question then

2018-09-01 01:36:28 UTC  

you can't really preemptively protect someone

2018-09-01 01:36:35 UTC  

Simply put police have no obligation to protect

2018-09-01 01:36:44 UTC  

wtf do police do then

2018-09-01 01:36:52 UTC  

kill black people

2018-09-01 01:36:52 UTC  

put people in jail afterwards

2018-09-01 01:36:55 UTC  

that's their only job

2018-09-01 01:37:12 UTC  

that's not preventative at it's core

2018-09-01 01:37:46 UTC  

Police should have a duty to protect citizens from criminals

2018-09-01 01:37:54 UTC  

Actively

2018-09-01 01:38:03 UTC  

to what degree

2018-09-01 01:38:04 UTC  

I think the institution should be abolished as a whole and replaced with community watches

2018-09-01 01:38:28 UTC  

Should police be forced to stay by you if you feel you're in danger?

2018-09-01 01:38:32 UTC  

Police should help out the community in general, and build stronger relationships with the people

2018-09-01 01:38:37 UTC  

Investing individuals with the power of the institution of the police leads to abuse of said power

2018-09-01 01:38:41 UTC  

naturally

2018-09-01 01:38:50 UTC  

In my opinion, the perfect government takes some taxes for the purpose of infrastructure, defense, borders, and protection from each other in the form of police.

2018-09-01 01:38:53 UTC  

I mean, the Stanford Prison Experiment reveals that to some degree

2018-09-01 01:39:06 UTC  

but statistics reveal real world applicable examples

2018-09-01 01:39:14 UTC  

@Deleted User No, not forced, but if a criminal is Robbing you, and you call on an officer to help you, they should help because it's a criminal

2018-09-01 01:39:15 UTC  

and that's all they do

2018-09-01 01:39:29 UTC  

Griselda the commie here

2018-09-01 01:39:36 UTC  

thinking that infrastructure spending needs to be a thing

2018-09-01 01:39:47 UTC  

and why should I pay for the police when I can hire mercenaries?

2018-09-01 01:39:53 UTC  

Silly leftists

2018-09-01 01:39:58 UTC  

b8

2018-09-01 01:40:00 UTC  

Fair point

2018-09-01 01:40:02 UTC  

well yeah

2018-09-01 01:40:04 UTC  

obviously

2018-09-01 01:40:07 UTC  

Yeah that currently doesn't exist

2018-09-01 01:40:16 UTC  

Police don't have to stop crimes in progress

2018-09-01 01:40:25 UTC  

They should have to

2018-09-01 01:40:28 UTC  

Fucken retarded

2018-09-01 01:40:35 UTC  

Yeah thought it'd be an interesting issue to shine lighto n

2018-09-01 01:40:56 UTC  

WASHINGTON, June 27 - The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.

The decision, with an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia and dissents from Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, overturned a ruling by a federal appeals court in Colorado. The appeals court had permitted a lawsuit to proceed against a Colorado town, Castle Rock, for the failure of the police to respond to a woman's pleas for help after her estranged husband violated a protective order by kidnapping their three young daughters, whom he eventually killed.

For hours on the night of June 22, 1999, Jessica Gonzales tried to get the Castle Rock police to find and arrest her estranged husband, Simon Gonzales, who was under a court order to stay 100 yards away from the house. He had taken the children, ages 7, 9 and 10, as they played outside, and he later called his wife to tell her that he had the girls at an amusement park in Denver.

2018-09-01 01:41:06 UTC  

America's a garbage nation

2018-09-01 01:41:06 UTC  

ngl

2018-09-01 01:41:14 UTC  

I don't understand why the fuck anyone would be an american nationalist