marriage isn't a religious institution at this point in society

its a bit of both, depends, depends (although i tend to disagree)

@21tagtmeiern thats an issue especially when it has ceremonies in churches mosques and synagogues

Don’t know enough to answer
Yes
Yes

If it doesn’t bother me, harm me, or force me to change anything against my will then why should I have the power to override someone else’s happiness.

ig religious institutions shouldn't be forced to marry people

but marriage licenses should be given to gay people

"If it doesn't bother me' really just means "if it doesn't immediately affect me" @killsometime

@21tagtmeiern you have a hammer and sickle in your pic and seem pretty pro-gay, how do you define politically? don't seem too right wing at face value

He's not right wing

yeah lol

I thought this was a right wing discord? 🤔

i'm not a real commie

he has libtard role

it is

so he can be trolled epic style

by far right nazi ben bhapiro

BEN SHAPIRO DESTROYS THE ECONOMY WITH FACTS AND LOGIC

BEN SHAPIRO ABSOLUTELY WRECKS SOCIALIST WITH HUMAN NATURE

Ok, this is epic.

@The Big Oof how would it affect me

1) There is no scientific consensus on the matter, the APA and APsychiatric A both work off the kinsey study and used flawed logic to argue that one is born homosexual, there is equal evidence for it being a learned trait.

2) No, marriage as dictated by the institutions that be and the majority as well as the purposeo fmarriage is to rear a child. Homosexuals often do cheat in their relationships which are not monogamous, often participating much more in well... other deviant and extreme behaviours.

3) No.... Simply because you deprive the child of normalcy to which it is entitled, a normal parental setting which will not groom them or predispose them to choosing a different lifestyle. No parental setting is prefeable to a skewed one.

No one is entitled to anything, especially normalcy

%

They have higher rates of STDs for one, and that is going to need to be treated and as we currently see, money will be spent on public awareness campaigns for prevention @killsometime

Unless you're a lolbert type who believes in privatized healthcare, in which case it wouldn't.

6

That’s commie shit

there are libertarian arguments against homosexuality

I don't see who you can be a libertarian and oppose it

as they are money drains who vote for bigger states

*how

much like minorities

Or I just don’t have sex with a gay dude. If they wanna be stupid and have unprotected sex, that’s once again, not my problem. Not my job to protect them. All I worry about is me, my family, and my cat.

@killsometime You missed the point

Public funds will be used to address that

the only way to smash the state is deporting blacks and gays

since they prevent the majority needed for libertarian values

obviously

in other words, your tax dollars

I mean generally speaking homosexuals do participate and promote and recruit into legitimately what cna be considered sexual degeneracy at extreme rates, as well as being 11:1 pedofiles as compared to hetero pedofiles. Is this a link? To some degree yes as homo tend to find younger persons more attractive often goign into pederasty territory

the main issue arises from there becoming a seperate identity