yep

Essentially my group dynamics thing rant is to say that the moment you get a gay movement going, they become a subversive group trying to establish themselves and seperate from society and seek to break down that society to secure their own existence. Which explains their import of muslims, and other minorities.

Their sexuality becomes their identity

which is the biggest problem

^

I understand that. The government shouldn’t dictate how the culture evolves though. It should happen organically with the people. Not have it forced by the government. Do I personally approve of gays? Not at all. So what? It’s not my problem what they shove up their ass. The whole “laws are sometimes written with the intention of fostering a certain culture” sounds like some shit that would be said in support of Prohibition. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. I personally believe the job of the government is to govern and accommodate themselves to the culture as it evolves. Not change the culture of the nation to what the government wants.

it's all they think of themselves as

having an entire identity in sexuality is purely degenerate and nothing else

The intention of prohibition was noble, but the policy was stupid

it worked tho

its the same as people who pride themselves on doing nothing but drugs

Prohibition did not work

dropped liver cirhossis drastically

weed smokers, drunkards

alchoholism went down, it was never a good idea long term but it did work medically.

say had prohibition been relegated to a short span

well planned and executed

with the right medical facilities and all

rather than halfhazard and messy

it would have legitimately changed the face of the nation.

Well I guess that’s worth the massive explosion of organized crime and underground market for alcohol

Said nobody

When your leading cause of death is liver crihorssis it becomes a measure that has to be considered (at least I believe that was the leading cause of death pre prohibition, at least for chronic medical causes)

It was such a failure that it managed to have enough support to pass an amendment to repeal the amendment that created prohibition

How many people even died from that before prohibition?

I think it was substantial enough looking into CDC right now.

i may be wrong

Well if you’re using it as the centerpiece of your argument then you should have a good idea on the stats

cirrhosis dropped massively after prohibition

apparently the document is the size of jupiter 1 sec

@killsometime

"The government shouldn’t dictate how the culture evolves though. It should happen organically with the people."

It absolutely should.

holy shit well, time to dive in

"Whenever respect for the State declines and the disintegrating and centrifugal tendencies of individuals and groups prevail, nations are headed for decay"

-Benito Mussolini

Yes, who wouldn’t want to use the ideals of Mussolini in the United States.

Libertarianism doesn't work

Not only from an economic perspective

okay well the CDC's document crashed my plug in

It just never lasts

will look into other stats

>inb4 "Well the US was libertarian"

No it wasn't