Message from @Zayan Watchel
Discord ID: 493525150503796753
What's the topic
If you agreed to it violating your rights then you made that decision. Contracts are important.
Even if it violates your rights,
An NDA is technically violating your rights.
@Doctor Anon Lolbert is taking the "LOL READ YOUR CONTRACT" approach to big tech gathering your data, while failing to realize the greater point
by signing the contract you consent to it.
no, that is gay lolbertarianism
The contracts are retarded
Legal speak
Normal humans can't comprehend it
NDA doesn't violate a right
Free speech?
@Zayan Watchel Let me make one thing clear, and let's establish one thing before this conversation continues:
Even if I don;t agree to it, and refuse to use that service, most people will, and those companies will continue to get away with the practice and grow because of that, will they not?
You still have free speech
@Doctor Anon Lolbert doesn't realize how dumb the average person is
No, not really. They take away your right of speech under this guise of "Hate Speech"
@The Big Oof
you need to look at this on the level of individual choice. These individuals all consented to it.
Big social platforms shouldn't be recognized as just private companies
I'm not responding anymore
They should be recognized as that, social platforms, subject to the bill of rights
If you sign a contract it can override your rights. YOU MADE THAT CHOICE!
^
Nobody forced you to sign a contract.
They are rights
They cannot be stripped
No I disagree on treating a social media platform as being anything more than a private company
Contracts should not and shall not impede on rights
How do you sign a None Disclosure Agreement if a contract can't override your rights?
Just stating that isn't an argument.
@Zayan Watchel Emojing your responses isn't meant to be an argument.
This "not an argument!" attitude among lolberts needs to stop.
It's not an argument, because it isn't meant to be one.
ffs
In an NDA the signer knows what they are getting into
NDA doesn't get rid of you freedom of speech
99.99% of people cannot understand the legal speak in a social platforms contract
Yes. The signer does know, and you should because you should be reading your contracts!
Saying "you're stupid," likewise, isn't an argument either, it's just an observation.
Corporate shill
Then hire a lawyer to read it, or don't sign.
I need a lawyer to use YouTube?
Not if you know the implications of the contract you sign in using it.