*are not smart enough

A contract should not be recognized if it violates rights imo

Then why are you mocking them being binding?

^

What's the topic

If you agreed to it violating your rights then you made that decision. Contracts are important.

Even if it violates your rights,

An NDA is technically violating your rights.

@Doctor Anon Lolbert is taking the "LOL READ YOUR CONTRACT" approach to big tech gathering your data, while failing to realize the greater point

by signing the contract you consent to it.

no, that is gay lolbertarianism

The contracts are retarded

Legal speak

Normal humans can't comprehend it

NDA doesn't violate a right

Free speech?

@Zayan Watchel Let me make one thing clear, and let's establish one thing before this conversation continues:

Even if I don;t agree to it, and refuse to use that service, most people will, and those companies will continue to get away with the practice and grow because of that, will they not?

You still have free speech

@Doctor Anon Lolbert doesn't realize how dumb the average person is

No, not really. They take away your right of speech under this guise of "Hate Speech"

@The Big Oof
you need to look at this on the level of individual choice. These individuals all consented to it.

Big social platforms shouldn't be recognized as just private companies

I'm not responding anymore

They should be recognized as that, social platforms, subject to the bill of rights

Stop Emoji-ing my comments. They're not an argument!

If you sign a contract it can override your rights. YOU MADE THAT CHOICE!

^

Nobody forced you to sign a contract.

They are rights

They cannot be stripped

No I disagree on treating a social media platform as being anything more than a private company

Contracts should not and shall not impede on rights

How do you sign a None Disclosure Agreement if a contract can't override your rights?

Just stating that isn't an argument.

@Zayan Watchel Emojing your responses isn't meant to be an argument.

This "not an argument!" attitude among lolberts needs to stop.

It's not an argument, because it isn't meant to be one.

ffs

In an NDA the signer knows what they are getting into

NDA doesn't get rid of you freedom of speech

99.99% of people cannot understand the legal speak in a social platforms contract

Yes. The signer does know, and you should because you should be reading your contracts!

Saying "you're stupid," likewise, isn't an argument either, it's just an observation.